Skip to content

CTAP vs RSBT

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF

RSBTDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAP −0.88pt a year

CTAP0.13%RSBT1.01%

Avg volume · 30D

CTAP 1.7×the volume

CTAP86.8KRSBT49.9K

CTAP vs RSBT Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+21.5%CTAP+7.4%RSBT

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CTAP +21.5%. RSBT +7.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%15%25%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTAP 0.13%, better
RSBT 1.01%
Fund size
CTAP $167M
RSBT $163M
1Y total return
CTAP No data
RSBT +8.7%
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
RSBT 2.98%
Holdings
CTAP 42
RSBT 15
Avg volume (30D)
CTAP 86.8K sh, better
RSBT 49.9K sh
NAV per share
CTAP $30.26
RSBT $19.30
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59. RSBT: Cost 17, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 16, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAP, RSBT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAPRSBT
Cost30% weightA100HigherF17
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45C48Higher
Tradability15% weightB67B67
Holdings10% weightC42HigherF16
Durability5% weightB59B62Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAP and RSBT are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

CTAP ranks 2nd and RSBT 14th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 13DARPPMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETFScore 37
  5. Rank 14DRSBTReturn Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETFScore 36
  6. Rank 14DRSBYReturn Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

RSBTDReturn Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF

In short

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

RSBT Most portfolios make you choose: bonds, or a trend-following diversifier. RSBT stacks both on the same dollar, using leverage to run a bond strategy with a managed futures strategy inside one ticker.

Stated mandate

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

RSBT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is an actively managed ETF combining a bond strategy with a Managed Futures strategy, using leverage to stack their returns.

Why people hold it

  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.
  • RSBT One ticker doing two jobs: an actively managed bond strategy with a managed futures strategy stacked on top through leverage, so the diversifier doesn't displace the bond sleeve.
  • Managed futures normally arrives as a separate line item you fund by selling something else. The stack builds that trade into the fund instead.
  • Runs as a standard 1940 Act ETF, so the futures exposure comes without a limited partnership structure wrapped around it.
  • Launched in 2023 as part of the small group of funds built explicitly around return stacking rather than plain asset-allocation slices.

Worth knowing

  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us
  • RSBT At 1.01%, it runs well above straight allocation peers (AOA at 0.19%, NTSX at 0.20%). Leverage plus active trend management carries a higher price tag.
  • Stacking works both directions: leverage means the bond side and the trend side can move against you at the same time.
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads matter more here than in the category's giants, and distributions land once or twice a year rather than monthly.

Full CTAP profile⁠

Full RSBT profile⁠

CTAP vs RSBT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAP vs RSBT Cost

Overpaying RSBT vs CTAP

$16,124

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

  • RSBT 1.01%

    $18,850

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAP 0.13%
  • RSBT 1.01%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530RSBT $18,850CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearCTAPRSBTOverpaying
10$238$1,780$1,542
20$930$6,686$5,756
30$2,726$18,850$16,124

Expense ratio

  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • 1.01%RSBT
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

RSBT 15th cheapest of 19 funds

CTAP vs RSBT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
RSBT 2.98%
Payout (12M)
CTAP No data
RSBT $0.57
Last payment
CTAP $0.30
RSBT $0.57
Ex-dividend
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
RSBT Dec 29, 2025
Paid on
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
RSBT Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
CTAP Quarterly
RSBT Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
RSBTIrregular · 2 paymentsAll RSBT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.41; Dec 29, 2025 $0.57. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

CTAP vs RSBT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAP No dataRSBT 11.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAP No dataRSBT 0.09
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAP No dataRSBT −23.6%since Feb 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAP 1.34RSBT 0.39

CTAP and RSBT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CTAPAvsNTSXA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSBTDvsNTSXA

    Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsGDEB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSBTDvsGDEB

    Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSBTDvsNTSIB

    Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.