CTAP ranks 2nd and RSBT 14th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
CTAP vs RSBT
CTAP −0.88pt a year
0.13%1.01%
CTAP 1.7×the volume
86.8K49.9K
CTAP vs RSBT Performance
+21.5%+7.4%
- CTAP 0.13%, better
- RSBT 1.01%
- CTAP $167M
- RSBT $163M
- CTAP
- RSBT +8.7%
- CTAP
- RSBT 2.98%
- CTAP 42
- RSBT 15
- CTAP 86.8K sh, better
- RSBT 49.9K sh
- CTAP $30.26
- RSBT $19.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTAP | RSBT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | B67 |
| Holdings | C42Higher | F16 |
| Durability | B59 | B62Higher |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. CTAP and RSBT are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CTAPA
RSBTD
In short
CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.
RSBT Most portfolios make you choose: bonds, or a trend-following diversifier. RSBT stacks both on the same dollar, using leverage to run a bond strategy with a managed futures strategy inside one ticker.
Stated mandate
CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.
RSBT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is an actively managed ETF combining a bond strategy with a Managed Futures strategy, using leverage to stack their returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CTAP vs RSBT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTAP vs RSBT Cost
Overpaying RSBT vs CTAP
$16,124
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTAP 0.13%
$2,726
RSBT 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTAP | RSBT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $238 | $1,780 | $1,542 |
| 20 | $930 | $6,686 | $5,756 |
| 30 | $2,726 | $18,850 | $16,124 |
- 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
- 1.01%RSBT
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
CTAP cheapest of 19 funds
RSBT 15th cheapest of 19 funds
CTAP vs RSBT Dividends
- CTAP
- RSBT 2.98%
- CTAP
- RSBT $0.57
- CTAP $0.30
- RSBT $0.57
- CTAP Sep 25, 2026
- RSBT Dec 29, 2025
- CTAP Sep 30, 2026
- RSBT Dec 30, 2025
- CTAP Quarterly
- RSBT Irregular
Distribution history
CTAP vs RSBT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTAP RSBT 11.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTAP RSBT 0.09
- Worst fall
- CTAP RSBT −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CTAP 1.34RSBT 0.39
CTAP and RSBT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.13% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


