Skip to content

NTSX vs RPAR

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

NTSXANYSE Arca

RPAR Risk Parity ETF

RPARCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

NTSX −0.30pt a year

NTSX0.22%RPAR0.52%

Avg volume · 30D

NTSX 1.9×the volume

NTSX42.9KRPAR22.8K

5Y return · a year

NTSX +7.3pt

NTSX+7.4%RPAR+0.1%

NTSX vs RPAR Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+43.1%NTSX+0.7%RPAR

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. NTSX +43.1%. RPAR +0.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
NTSX 0.22%, better
RPAR 0.52%
Fund size
NTSX $1.34B
RPAR $552M
1Y total return
NTSX +7.5%, better
RPAR +2.8%
Yield (12M)
NTSX 1.07%
RPAR 2.35%, better
Holdings
NTSX 504
RPAR 150
Avg volume (30D)
NTSX 42.9K sh, better
RPAR 22.8K sh
NAV per share
NTSX $58.77
RPAR $21.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NTSX: Cost 89, Risk 64, Mission 98, Tradability 72, Holdings 72, Durability 93. RPAR: Cost 56, Risk 57, Mission 79, Tradability 31, Holdings 72, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for NTSX, RPAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNTSXRPAR
Cost30% weightA89HigherB56
Mission25% weightA98HigherA79
Risk15% weightB64HigherB57
Tradability15% weightA72HigherD31
Holdings10% weightA72A72
Durability5% weightA93HigherA76

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NTSX and RPAR are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

NTSX ranks 1st and RPAR 8th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 7BRSSBReturn Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 8CRPARRPAR Risk Parity ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 9CNTSEWisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core FundScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NTSXAWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

RPARCRPAR Risk Parity ETF

In short

NTSX Stocks and Treasuries stacked on the same dollar. NTSX owns roughly 500 large U.S. companies, then layers Treasury futures on top, so one line item does the work of a balanced portfolio. Running since 2018.

RPAR Most allocation funds split dollars between stocks and bonds. RPAR splits risk: an equal share to global stocks, long-dated TIPS, Treasuries and commodities including gold. It arrived in 2019 as the first US ETF built around risk parity.

Stated mandate

NTSX The Fund seeks total return through investments in large-capitalization U.S. equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts.

RPAR The Fund seeks positive returns during economic growth, capital preservation during contraction, and preservation of real returns during heightened inflation.

Why people hold it

  • NTSX Costs 0.20% a year, while the typical fund in its allocation peer group charges closer to four times that.
  • The equity sleeve is a plain large-cap U.S. portfolio of roughly 500 names. The Treasury futures ride alongside as collateralized exposure, not as a stock-picking bet.wisdomtree.com
  • Delivers its stated mandate with very little drift, and rates among the strongest builds in a crowded field of allocation funds.
  • Sibling GDE runs the same capital-efficient playbook at the same 0.20% fee, swapping the Treasury leg for gold, if you want the mechanism pointed elsewhere.
  • RPAR Balances by risk, not dollars. The index targets a 25% risk share for each of four asset classes, so low-volatility long-term TIPS carry a bigger dollar weight than stocks.sec.gov
  • The stated objective covers three economic weather patterns: gains in growth, capital preservation in contraction, and real returns intact when inflation runs hot.sec.gov
  • A 0.52% expense ratio, below the median for multi-asset allocation funds, and it stands in the upper half of that large, crowded cohort.
  • Rules over hunches. The adviser trades to reflect the index's quarterly rebalance rather than picking what looks attractive that week.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • NTSX Futures mean total market exposure runs above the fund's actual assets. When stocks and Treasuries fall together, the drop lands harder than in an unlevered balanced fund.
  • Trades thinly for a multi-billion-dollar fund. Limit orders and quieter parts of the session matter more here than with the mega-cap index crowd.
  • Income is a side effect of the structure, not the goal. Distributions come quarterly.
  • RPAR The Treasury sleeve runs through futures collateralized by T-bills, so notional Treasury exposure exceeds the cash weight. That built-in leverage magnifies moves both ways.sec.gov
  • The TIPS target is 15+ year maturities, the most rate-sensitive corner of the inflation-linked market.sec.gov
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads and order type matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full NTSX profile⁠

Full RPAR profile⁠

NTSX vs RPAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NTSX vs RPAR Cost

Overpaying RPAR vs NTSX

$5,793

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NTSX 0.22%

    $4,558

  • RPAR 0.52%

    $10,351

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NTSX 0.22%
  • RPAR 0.52%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530RPAR $10,351NTSX $4,558

Year by year

YearNTSXRPAROverpaying
10$401$935$534
20$1,561$3,593$2,032
30$4,558$10,351$5,793

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%NTSX, cheaper
  • 0.52%RPAR
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

NTSX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

RPAR 9th cheapest of 19 funds

NTSX vs RPAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
NTSX 1.07%
RPAR 2.35%, better
Payout (12M)
NTSX $0.63
RPAR $0.51
Last payment
NTSX $0.16
RPAR $0.11
Ex-dividend
NTSX Sep 25, 2026
RPAR Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
NTSX Sep 29, 2026
RPAR Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
NTSX Quarterly
RPAR Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

NTSXQuarterly · 34 paymentsAll NTSX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 24, 2018 $0.08; Mar 26, 2019 $0.09; Jun 24, 2019 $0.10; Sep 24, 2019 $0.04; Dec 9, 2019 $0.11; Dec 23, 2019 $0.12; Mar 24, 2020 $0.04; Jun 23, 2020 $0.08; Sep 22, 2020 $0.09; Dec 21, 2020 $0.12; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 24, 2021 $0.09; Sep 24, 2021 $0.09; Dec 27, 2021 $0.10; Mar 25, 2022 $0.09; Jun 24, 2022 $0.12; Sep 26, 2022 $0.12; Dec 23, 2022 $0.12; Mar 27, 2023 $0.10; Jun 26, 2023 $0.11; Sep 25, 2023 $0.13; Dec 22, 2023 $0.14; Mar 22, 2024 $0.11; Jun 25, 2024 $0.13; Sep 25, 2024 $0.13; Dec 26, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2025 $0.16; Sep 25, 2025 $0.17; Dec 26, 2025 $0.17; Mar 26, 2026 $0.15; Jun 25, 2026 $0.16; Sep 25, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
RPARQuarterly · 28 paymentsAll RPAR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 28 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2019 $0.05; Mar 25, 2020 $0.04; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.05; Dec 16, 2020 $0.08; Mar 24, 2021 $0.04; Jun 23, 2021 $0.07; Sep 22, 2021 $0.08; Dec 28, 2021 $0.32; Mar 28, 2022 $0.14; Jun 27, 2022 $0.27; Sep 27, 2022 $0.26; Dec 27, 2022 $0.07; Mar 28, 2023 $0.08; Jun 27, 2023 $0.18; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 26, 2023 $0.20; Mar 25, 2024 $0.05; Jun 26, 2024 $0.21; Sep 26, 2024 $0.09; Dec 27, 2024 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.08; Jun 27, 2025 $0.24; Sep 29, 2025 $0.13; Dec 29, 2025 $0.10; Mar 27, 2026 $0.01; Jun 29, 2026 $0.29; Sep 28, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

NTSX vs RPAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • NTSX
  • RPAR
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: NTSX −31.3% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NTSX 12.7%RPAR 11.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NTSX 1.28, betterRPAR 0.62
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NTSX −31.3%RPAR −30.1%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NTSX 1.04RPAR 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • NTSXAvsCTAPA

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPARCvsCTAPA

    RPAR Risk Parity ETF · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsGDEB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPARCvsGDEB

    RPAR Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsNTSIB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPARCvsNTSIB

    RPAR Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.