Skip to content

CTAP vs RPAR

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

RPAR Risk Parity ETF

RPARCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAP −0.39pt a year

CTAP0.13%RPAR0.52%

Avg volume · 30D

CTAP 3.8×the volume

CTAP86.8KRPAR22.8K

CTAP vs RPAR Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+12.8%CTAP+2.8%RPAR

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CTAP +12.8%. RPAR +2.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%25%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CTAP 0.13%, better
RPAR 0.52%
Fund size
CTAP $167M
RPAR $552M
1Y total return
CTAP No data
RPAR +2.8%
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
RPAR 2.35%
Holdings
CTAP 42
RPAR 150
Avg volume (30D)
CTAP 86.8K sh, better
RPAR 22.8K sh
NAV per share
CTAP $30.26
RPAR $21.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59. RPAR: Cost 56, Risk 57, Mission 79, Tradability 31, Holdings 72, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAP, RPAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAPRPAR
Cost30% weightA100HigherB56
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightC45B57Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherD31
Holdings10% weightC42A72Higher
Durability5% weightB59A76Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAP and RPAR are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

CTAP ranks 2nd and RPAR 8th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 7BRSSBReturn Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 8CRPARRPAR Risk Parity ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 9CNTSEWisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core FundScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

RPARCRPAR Risk Parity ETF

In short

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

RPAR Most allocation funds split dollars between stocks and bonds. RPAR splits risk: an equal share to global stocks, long-dated TIPS, Treasuries and commodities including gold. It arrived in 2019 as the first US ETF built around risk parity.

Stated mandate

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

RPAR The Fund seeks positive returns during economic growth, capital preservation during contraction, and preservation of real returns during heightened inflation.

Why people hold it

  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.
  • RPAR Balances by risk, not dollars. The index targets a 25% risk share for each of four asset classes, so low-volatility long-term TIPS carry a bigger dollar weight than stocks.sec.gov
  • The stated objective covers three economic weather patterns: gains in growth, capital preservation in contraction, and real returns intact when inflation runs hot.sec.gov
  • A 0.52% expense ratio, below the median for multi-asset allocation funds, and it stands in the upper half of that large, crowded cohort.
  • Rules over hunches. The adviser trades to reflect the index's quarterly rebalance rather than picking what looks attractive that week.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us
  • RPAR The Treasury sleeve runs through futures collateralized by T-bills, so notional Treasury exposure exceeds the cash weight. That built-in leverage magnifies moves both ways.sec.gov
  • The TIPS target is 15+ year maturities, the most rate-sensitive corner of the inflation-linked market.sec.gov
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads and order type matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full CTAP profile⁠

Full RPAR profile⁠

CTAP vs RPAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAP vs RPAR Cost

Overpaying RPAR vs CTAP

$7,625

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

  • RPAR 0.52%

    $10,351

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAP 0.13%
  • RPAR 0.52%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530RPAR $10,351CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearCTAPRPAROverpaying
10$238$935$697
20$930$3,593$2,663
30$2,726$10,351$7,625

Expense ratio

  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • 0.52%RPAR
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

RPAR 9th cheapest of 19 funds

CTAP vs RPAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
RPAR 2.35%
Payout (12M)
CTAP No data
RPAR $0.51
Last payment
CTAP $0.30
RPAR $0.11
Ex-dividend
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
RPAR Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
RPAR Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
CTAP Quarterly
RPAR Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
RPARQuarterly · 28 paymentsAll RPAR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 28 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2019 $0.05; Mar 25, 2020 $0.04; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.05; Dec 16, 2020 $0.08; Mar 24, 2021 $0.04; Jun 23, 2021 $0.07; Sep 22, 2021 $0.08; Dec 28, 2021 $0.32; Mar 28, 2022 $0.14; Jun 27, 2022 $0.27; Sep 27, 2022 $0.26; Dec 27, 2022 $0.07; Mar 28, 2023 $0.08; Jun 27, 2023 $0.18; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 26, 2023 $0.20; Mar 25, 2024 $0.05; Jun 26, 2024 $0.21; Sep 26, 2024 $0.09; Dec 27, 2024 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.08; Jun 27, 2025 $0.24; Sep 29, 2025 $0.13; Dec 29, 2025 $0.10; Mar 27, 2026 $0.01; Jun 29, 2026 $0.29; Sep 28, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

CTAP vs RPAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAP No dataRPAR 11.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAP No dataRPAR 0.62
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAP No dataRPAR −30.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAP 1.34RPAR 1.08

CTAP and RPAR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CTAPAvsNTSXA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPARCvsNTSXA

    RPAR Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsGDEB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPARCvsGDEB

    RPAR Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPARCvsNTSIB

    RPAR Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.