Skip to content

NTSI vs RPAR

WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

NTSIBNYSE Arca

RPAR Risk Parity ETF

RPARCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

NTSI −0.24pt a year

NTSI0.28%RPAR0.52%

Avg volume · 30D

RPAR 1.2×the volume

NTSI18.9KRPAR22.8K

5Y return · a year

NTSI +5.2pt

NTSI+5.3%RPAR+0.1%

NTSI vs RPAR Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+29.7%NTSI+0.7%RPAR

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. NTSI +29.7%. RPAR +0.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%10%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
NTSI 0.28%, better
RPAR 0.52%
Fund size
NTSI $488M
RPAR $552M
1Y total return
NTSI +10.4%, better
RPAR +2.8%
Yield (12M)
NTSI 3.11%, better
RPAR 2.35%
Holdings
NTSI 458
RPAR 150
Avg volume (30D)
NTSI 18.9K sh
RPAR 22.8K sh, better
NAV per share
NTSI $46.48
RPAR $21.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NTSI: Cost 83, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 82, Durability 70. RPAR: Cost 56, Risk 57, Mission 79, Tradability 31, Holdings 72, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for NTSI, RPAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNTSIRPAR
Cost30% weightA83HigherB56
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightB57B57
Tradability15% weightC42HigherD31
Holdings10% weightA82HigherA72
Durability5% weightA70A76Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NTSI and RPAR are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

NTSI ranks 4th and RPAR 8th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 4BNTSIWisdomTree International Efficient Core FundScore 68
  5. Rank 5BALLWState Street Bridgewater All Weather ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 7BRSSBReturn Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETFScore 60
  7. Rank 8CRPARRPAR Risk Parity ETFScore 54
  8. Rank 9CNTSEWisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core FundScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NTSIBWisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

RPARCRPAR Risk Parity ETF

In short

NTSI Developed-market stocks and a U.S. Treasury futures sleeve sharing one seat. NTSI is WisdomTree's capital-efficient playbook pointed overseas: the stock exposure and the bond exposure don't have to compete for the same dollar.

RPAR Most allocation funds split dollars between stocks and bonds. RPAR splits risk: an equal share to global stocks, long-dated TIPS, Treasuries and commodities including gold. It arrived in 2019 as the first US ETF built around risk parity.

Stated mandate

NTSI The Fund seeks total return through international equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures. WisdomTree presents it as a capital-efficient balanced strategy intended to provide international equity exposure with Treasury-futures diversification.

RPAR The Fund seeks positive returns during economic growth, capital preservation during contraction, and preservation of real returns during heightened inflation.

Why people hold it

  • NTSI Charges 0.26% a year, roughly a third of what the typical allocation fund in its group costs.
  • One wrapper, two jobs: developed international equities plus U.S. Treasury futures, so the bond side doesn't eat cash the stock side needs.
  • The equity base is broad, roughly 500 names across developed markets outside the U.S.
  • One of the stronger builds in a crowded allocation field, alongside WisdomTree siblings NTSX (U.S. version) and GDE (gold version).
  • RPAR Balances by risk, not dollars. The index targets a 25% risk share for each of four asset classes, so low-volatility long-term TIPS carry a bigger dollar weight than stocks.sec.gov
  • The stated objective covers three economic weather patterns: gains in growth, capital preservation in contraction, and real returns intact when inflation runs hot.sec.gov
  • A 0.52% expense ratio, below the median for multi-asset allocation funds, and it stands in the upper half of that large, crowded cohort.
  • Rules over hunches. The adviser trades to reflect the index's quarterly rebalance rather than picking what looks attractive that week.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • NTSI Futures push total exposure above the cash invested. That cuts both ways: moves are amplified up and down.
  • Thinly traded, so spreads can add to the cost of getting in and out beyond the headline fee.
  • Actively run on quantitative models and launched in 2021, a shorter history than the plain-vanilla balanced funds it sits next to.
  • RPAR The Treasury sleeve runs through futures collateralized by T-bills, so notional Treasury exposure exceeds the cash weight. That built-in leverage magnifies moves both ways.sec.gov
  • The TIPS target is 15+ year maturities, the most rate-sensitive corner of the inflation-linked market.sec.gov
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads and order type matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full NTSI profile⁠

Full RPAR profile⁠

NTSI vs RPAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NTSI vs RPAR Cost

Overpaying RPAR vs NTSI

$4,596

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NTSI 0.28%

    $5,755

  • RPAR 0.52%

    $10,351

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NTSI 0.28%
  • RPAR 0.52%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530RPAR $10,351NTSI $5,755

Year by year

YearNTSIRPAROverpaying
10$509$935$426
20$1,976$3,593$1,617
30$5,755$10,351$4,596

Expense ratio

  • 0.28%NTSI, cheaper
  • 0.52%RPAR
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

NTSI 4th cheapest of 19 funds

RPAR 9th cheapest of 19 funds

NTSI vs RPAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
NTSI 3.11%, better
RPAR 2.35%
Payout (12M)
NTSI $1.45
RPAR $0.51
Last payment
NTSI $0.01
RPAR $0.11
Ex-dividend
NTSI Sep 25, 2026
RPAR Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
NTSI Sep 29, 2026
RPAR Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
NTSI Quarterly
RPAR Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

NTSIQuarterly · 23 paymentsAll NTSI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2021 $0.04; Sep 24, 2021 $0.18; Dec 7, 2021 $0.02; Dec 27, 2021 $0.16; Mar 25, 2022 $0.14; Jun 24, 2022 $0.49; Sep 26, 2022 $0.12; Dec 23, 2022 $0.10; Mar 27, 2023 $0.21; Jun 26, 2023 $0.34; Sep 25, 2023 $0.16; Dec 22, 2023 $0.14; Mar 22, 2024 $0.22; Jun 25, 2024 $0.39; Sep 25, 2024 $0.21; Dec 31, 2024 $0.01; Mar 26, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2025 $0.54; Sep 25, 2025 $0.22; Dec 26, 2025 $0.73; Mar 26, 2026 $0.17; Jun 25, 2026 $0.54; Sep 25, 2026 $0.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
RPARQuarterly · 28 paymentsAll RPAR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 28 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2019 $0.05; Mar 25, 2020 $0.04; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.05; Dec 16, 2020 $0.08; Mar 24, 2021 $0.04; Jun 23, 2021 $0.07; Sep 22, 2021 $0.08; Dec 28, 2021 $0.32; Mar 28, 2022 $0.14; Jun 27, 2022 $0.27; Sep 27, 2022 $0.26; Dec 27, 2022 $0.07; Mar 28, 2023 $0.08; Jun 27, 2023 $0.18; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 26, 2023 $0.20; Mar 25, 2024 $0.05; Jun 26, 2024 $0.21; Sep 26, 2024 $0.09; Dec 27, 2024 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.08; Jun 27, 2025 $0.24; Sep 29, 2025 $0.13; Dec 29, 2025 $0.10; Mar 27, 2026 $0.01; Jun 29, 2026 $0.29; Sep 28, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

NTSI vs RPAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • NTSI
  • RPAR
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: NTSI −33.4% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NTSI 12.9%RPAR 11.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NTSI 0.99, betterRPAR 0.62
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NTSI −33.4%RPAR −30.1%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NTSI 0.93RPAR 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • NTSIBvsNTSXA

    WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPARCvsNTSXA

    RPAR Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSIBvsCTAPA

    WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPARCvsCTAPA

    RPAR Risk Parity ETF · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSIBvsGDEB

    WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RPARCvsGDEB

    RPAR Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.