Skip to content

NTSX vs RSSB

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

NTSXANYSE Arca

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF

RSSBBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

NTSX −0.17pt a year

NTSX0.22%RSSB0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

RSSB 1.5×the volume

NTSX42.9KRSSB64.6K

NTSX vs RSSB Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+7.5%NTSX+6.7%RSSB

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. NTSX +7.5%. RSSB +6.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%10%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
NTSX 0.22%, better
RSSB 0.39%
Fund size
NTSX $1.34B
RSSB $497M
1Y total return
NTSX +7.5%, better
RSSB +6.7%
Yield (12M)
NTSX 1.07%
RSSB 3.28%, better
Holdings
NTSX 504
RSSB 9
Avg volume (30D)
NTSX 42.9K sh
RSSB 64.6K sh, better
NAV per share
NTSX $58.77
RSSB $29.83
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NTSX: Cost 89, Risk 64, Mission 98, Tradability 72, Holdings 72, Durability 93. RSSB: Cost 61, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for NTSX, RSSB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNTSXRSSB
Cost30% weightA89HigherB61
Mission25% weightA98Not scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherC52
Tradability15% weightA72HigherB66
Holdings10% weightA72Not scored
Durability5% weightA93HigherA70

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NTSX and RSSB are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

NTSX ranks 1st and RSSB 7th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 5BNTSDWisdomtree Efficient U.s. Plus International Equity FundScore 62
  4. Rank 7BRSSBReturn Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 8CRPARRPAR Risk Parity ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NTSXAWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

RSSBBReturn Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF

In short

NTSX Stocks and Treasuries stacked on the same dollar. NTSX owns roughly 500 large U.S. companies, then layers Treasury futures on top, so one line item does the work of a balanced portfolio. Running since 2018.

RSSB Most allocation funds make you split your dollar between stocks and bonds. RSSB stacks them instead: a global equity portfolio with a U.S. Treasury futures layer on top, wrapped in one ETF at 0.39%.

Stated mandate

NTSX The Fund seeks total return through investments in large-capitalization U.S. equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts.

RSSB The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • NTSX Costs 0.20% a year, while the typical fund in its allocation peer group charges closer to four times that.
  • The equity sleeve is a plain large-cap U.S. portfolio of roughly 500 names. The Treasury futures ride alongside as collateralized exposure, not as a stock-picking bet.wisdomtree.com
  • Delivers its stated mandate with very little drift, and rates among the strongest builds in a crowded field of allocation funds.
  • Sibling GDE runs the same capital-efficient playbook at the same 0.20% fee, swapping the Treasury leg for gold, if you want the mechanism pointed elsewhere.
  • RSSB 0.39% for a two-sleeve strategy, roughly half the typical expense ratio among allocation funds.
  • The equity leg is global, not U.S.-only. Stacked peers like NTSX and GDE build their layers on top of American stocks.
  • The Treasury futures leg lives inside the fund, a registered 1940 Act ETF, so layering bonds onto stocks doesn't require your own margin account.
  • Trades with reasonable liquidity for a strategy this young, and sits in the upper half of its allocation peer group overall.

Worth knowing

  • NTSX Futures mean total market exposure runs above the fund's actual assets. When stocks and Treasuries fall together, the drop lands harder than in an unlevered balanced fund.
  • Trades thinly for a multi-billion-dollar fund. Limit orders and quieter parts of the session matter more here than with the mega-cap index crowd.
  • Income is a side effect of the structure, not the goal. Distributions come quarterly.
  • RSSB Stacking puts more market exposure to work than the cash you hand over, so a stretch where stocks and Treasuries fall together bites harder than in a plain balanced fund.
  • Cash goes out once or twice a year, not monthly. This is a total-return mandate aimed at long-term capital appreciation, not a paycheck.
  • Launched December 2023, so the track record is short and hasn't been through many market regimes yet.

Full NTSX profile⁠

Full RSSB profile⁠

NTSX vs RSSB Holdings

How NTSX and RSSB differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NTSX and 0.0% of RSSB.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile63.2%
  • Sector11 Sectors88.7%

Sector

Sector weights in NTSX and RSSB, widest gap first
SectorMore in NTSXMore in RSSB
TechnologyNTSX +7.0 points
IndustrialsRSSB +4.0 points
FinancialsRSSB +3.5 points
MaterialsRSSB +2.5 points
CommunicationNTSX +2.3 points
Health CareNTSX +1.0 points
Real EstateRSSB +0.8 points
Consumer StaplesNTSX +0.8 points
UtilitiesRSSB +0.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryNTSX +0.3 points
EnergyRSSB +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in NTSX and RSSB, widest gap first
CountryMore in NTSXMore in RSSB
United StatesNTSX +36.8 points
JapanRSSB +5.9 points
TaiwanRSSB +3.4 points
United KingdomRSSB +2.9 points
CanadaRSSB +2.8 points
South KoreaRSSB +2.5 points
ChinaRSSB +2.3 points
SwitzerlandRSSB +1.9 points
Other countries (32)RSSB +15.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • NTSX43.3%
  • RSSB100.0%

Securities held

  • NTSX502
  • RSSB7

Asset class

NTSX
Alternatives
RSSB
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in NTSX502
  • In both0
  • Only in RSSB7

Only in NTSX

502 securities, 90.6% of NTSX by weight

  • Apple Inc7.09%
  • Nvidia Corp6.92%
  • Microsoft Corp5.26%

Only in RSSB

7 securities, 93.9% of RSSB by weight

  • State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF25.67%
  • Vanguard Total International Stock ETF16.89%
  • US 10YR NOTE (CBT)Dec2612.09%

Weight gaps

NTSX and RSSB share no securities.

All 509 NTSX holdings⁠All RSSB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NTSX vs RSSB Cost

Overpaying RSSB vs NTSX

$3,340

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NTSX 0.22%

    $4,558

  • RSSB 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NTSX 0.22%
  • RSSB 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RSSB $7,898NTSX $4,558

Year by year

YearNTSXRSSBOverpaying
10$401$705$304
20$1,561$2,725$1,164
30$4,558$7,898$3,340

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%NTSX, cheaper
  • 0.39%RSSB
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

NTSX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

RSSB 8th cheapest of 19 funds

NTSX vs RSSB Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
NTSX 1.07%
RSSB 3.28%, better
Payout (12M)
NTSX $0.63
RSSB $0.98
Last payment
NTSX $0.16
RSSB $0.98
Ex-dividend
NTSX Sep 25, 2026
RSSB Dec 29, 2025
Paid on
NTSX Sep 29, 2026
RSSB Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
NTSX Quarterly
RSSB Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

NTSXQuarterly · 34 paymentsAll NTSX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 24, 2018 $0.08; Mar 26, 2019 $0.09; Jun 24, 2019 $0.10; Sep 24, 2019 $0.04; Dec 9, 2019 $0.11; Dec 23, 2019 $0.12; Mar 24, 2020 $0.04; Jun 23, 2020 $0.08; Sep 22, 2020 $0.09; Dec 21, 2020 $0.12; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 24, 2021 $0.09; Sep 24, 2021 $0.09; Dec 27, 2021 $0.10; Mar 25, 2022 $0.09; Jun 24, 2022 $0.12; Sep 26, 2022 $0.12; Dec 23, 2022 $0.12; Mar 27, 2023 $0.10; Jun 26, 2023 $0.11; Sep 25, 2023 $0.13; Dec 22, 2023 $0.14; Mar 22, 2024 $0.11; Jun 25, 2024 $0.13; Sep 25, 2024 $0.13; Dec 26, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2025 $0.16; Sep 25, 2025 $0.17; Dec 26, 2025 $0.17; Mar 26, 2026 $0.15; Jun 25, 2026 $0.16; Sep 25, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD
RSSBAnnual · 3 paymentsAll RSSB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.13; Dec 18, 2024 $0.29; Dec 29, 2025 $0.98. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD

NTSX vs RSSB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NTSX 12.7%RSSB 13.6%since Jan 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NTSX 1.28RSSB 0.75since Jan 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NTSX −31.3%RSSB −16.1%since Dec 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NTSX 1.04RSSB 1.03

Popular comparisons

  • NTSXAvsCTAPA

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSBBvsCTAPA

    Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsGDEB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSBBvsGDEB

    Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsNTSIB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSBBvsNTSIB

    Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.