CTAP ranks 2nd and RSSB 7th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
CTAP vs RSSB
CTAP −0.26pt a year
0.13%0.39%
CTAP 1.3×the volume
86.8K64.6K
CTAP vs RSSB Performance
+12.8%+6.1%
- CTAP 0.13%, better
- RSSB 0.39%
- CTAP $167M
- RSSB $497M
- CTAP
- RSSB +6.7%
- CTAP
- RSSB 3.28%
- CTAP 42
- RSSB 9
- CTAP 86.8K sh, better
- RSSB 64.6K sh
- CTAP $30.26
- RSSB $29.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTAP | RSSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B61 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | C42 | |
| Durability | B59 | A70Higher |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. CTAP and RSSB are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CTAPA
RSSBB
In short
CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.
RSSB Most allocation funds make you split your dollar between stocks and bonds. RSSB stacks them instead: a global equity portfolio with a U.S. Treasury futures layer on top, wrapped in one ETF at 0.39%.
Stated mandate
CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.
RSSB The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CTAP vs RSSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTAP vs RSSB Cost
Overpaying RSSB vs CTAP
$5,172
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTAP 0.13%
$2,726
RSSB 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTAP | RSSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $238 | $705 | $467 |
| 20 | $930 | $2,725 | $1,795 |
| 30 | $2,726 | $7,898 | $5,172 |
- 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
- 0.39%RSSB
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
CTAP cheapest of 19 funds
RSSB 8th cheapest of 19 funds
CTAP vs RSSB Dividends
- CTAP
- RSSB 3.28%
- CTAP
- RSSB $0.98
- CTAP $0.30
- RSSB $0.98
- CTAP Sep 25, 2026
- RSSB Dec 29, 2025
- CTAP Sep 30, 2026
- RSSB Dec 30, 2025
- CTAP Quarterly
- RSSB Annual
Distribution history
CTAP vs RSSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTAP RSSB 13.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTAP RSSB 0.75
- Worst fall
- CTAP RSSB −16.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CTAP 1.34RSSB 1.03
CTAP and RSSB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.13% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


