Skip to content

CTAP vs RSSB

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF

RSSBBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAP −0.26pt a year

CTAP0.13%RSSB0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

CTAP 1.3×the volume

CTAP86.8KRSSB64.6K

CTAP vs RSSB Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+12.8%CTAP+6.1%RSSB

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CTAP +12.8%. RSSB +6.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%20%25%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CTAP 0.13%, better
RSSB 0.39%
Fund size
CTAP $167M
RSSB $497M
1Y total return
CTAP No data
RSSB +6.7%
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
RSSB 3.28%
Holdings
CTAP 42
RSSB 9
Avg volume (30D)
CTAP 86.8K sh, better
RSSB 64.6K sh
NAV per share
CTAP $30.26
RSSB $29.83
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59. RSSB: Cost 61, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAP, RSSB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAPRSSB
Cost30% weightA100HigherB61
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45C52Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherB66
Holdings10% weightC42Not scored
Durability5% weightB59A70Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAP and RSSB are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

CTAP ranks 2nd and RSSB 7th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 5BNTSDWisdomtree Efficient U.s. Plus International Equity FundScore 62
  5. Rank 7BRSSBReturn Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 8CRPARRPAR Risk Parity ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

RSSBBReturn Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF

In short

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

RSSB Most allocation funds make you split your dollar between stocks and bonds. RSSB stacks them instead: a global equity portfolio with a U.S. Treasury futures layer on top, wrapped in one ETF at 0.39%.

Stated mandate

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

RSSB The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.
  • RSSB 0.39% for a two-sleeve strategy, roughly half the typical expense ratio among allocation funds.
  • The equity leg is global, not U.S.-only. Stacked peers like NTSX and GDE build their layers on top of American stocks.
  • The Treasury futures leg lives inside the fund, a registered 1940 Act ETF, so layering bonds onto stocks doesn't require your own margin account.
  • Trades with reasonable liquidity for a strategy this young, and sits in the upper half of its allocation peer group overall.

Worth knowing

  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us
  • RSSB Stacking puts more market exposure to work than the cash you hand over, so a stretch where stocks and Treasuries fall together bites harder than in a plain balanced fund.
  • Cash goes out once or twice a year, not monthly. This is a total-return mandate aimed at long-term capital appreciation, not a paycheck.
  • Launched December 2023, so the track record is short and hasn't been through many market regimes yet.

Full CTAP profile⁠

Full RSSB profile⁠

CTAP vs RSSB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAP vs RSSB Cost

Overpaying RSSB vs CTAP

$5,172

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

  • RSSB 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAP 0.13%
  • RSSB 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RSSB $7,898CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearCTAPRSSBOverpaying
10$238$705$467
20$930$2,725$1,795
30$2,726$7,898$5,172

Expense ratio

  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • 0.39%RSSB
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

RSSB 8th cheapest of 19 funds

CTAP vs RSSB Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
RSSB 3.28%
Payout (12M)
CTAP No data
RSSB $0.98
Last payment
CTAP $0.30
RSSB $0.98
Ex-dividend
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
RSSB Dec 29, 2025
Paid on
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
RSSB Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
CTAP Quarterly
RSSB Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
RSSBAnnual · 3 paymentsAll RSSB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.13; Dec 18, 2024 $0.29; Dec 29, 2025 $0.98. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD

CTAP vs RSSB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAP No dataRSSB 13.6%since Jan 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAP No dataRSSB 0.75since Jan 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAP No dataRSSB −16.1%since Dec 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAP 1.34RSSB 1.03

CTAP and RSSB in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CTAPAvsNTSXA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSBBvsNTSXA

    Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsGDEB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSBBvsGDEB

    Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSSBBvsNTSIB

    Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.