Skip to content

NTSX vs UPAR

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

NTSXANYSE Arca

UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF

UPARCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

NTSX −0.46pt a year

NTSX0.22%UPAR0.68%

Avg volume · 30D

NTSX 4.4×the volume

NTSX42.9KUPAR9.81K

3Y return · a year

NTSX +7.9pt

NTSX+20.1%UPAR+12.2%

NTSX vs UPAR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+7.5%NTSX+2.1%UPAR

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. NTSX +7.5%. UPAR +2.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%10%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
NTSX 0.22%, better
UPAR 0.68%
Fund size
NTSX $1.34B
UPAR $55M
1Y total return
NTSX +7.5%, better
UPAR +2.1%
Yield (12M)
NTSX 1.07%
UPAR 3.37%, better
Holdings
NTSX 504
UPAR 153
Avg volume (30D)
NTSX 42.9K sh, better
UPAR 9.81K sh
NAV per share
NTSX $58.77
UPAR $15.28
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NTSX: Cost 89, Risk 64, Mission 98, Tradability 72, Holdings 72, Durability 93. UPAR: Cost 47, Risk 38, Mission 78, Tradability 34, Holdings 54, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for NTSX, UPAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNTSXUPAR
Cost30% weightA89HigherC47
Mission25% weightA98HigherA78
Risk15% weightB64HigherD38
Tradability15% weightA72HigherD34
Holdings10% weightA72HigherC54
Durability5% weightA93HigherC54

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NTSX and UPAR are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

NTSX ranks 1st and UPAR 10th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 10CGDTWisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold FundScore 43
  4. Rank 10CUPARUPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETFScore 43
  5. Rank 12CRSSTReturn Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NTSXAWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

UPARCUPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF

In short

NTSX Stocks and Treasuries stacked on the same dollar. NTSX owns roughly 500 large U.S. companies, then layers Treasury futures on top, so one line item does the work of a balanced portfolio. Running since 2018.

UPAR Risk parity built for four economic weathers, then dialed up. UPAR balances risk across global stocks, commodity producers and gold, TIPS and Treasuries, then levers the mix toward 160%-180% exposure, reset quarterly rather than daily.

Stated mandate

NTSX The Fund seeks total return through investments in large-capitalization U.S. equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts.

UPAR The actively managed Fund seeks positive returns during economic growth, capital preservation during economic contraction, and preservation of real returns during heightened inflation.

Why people hold it

  • NTSX Costs 0.20% a year, while the typical fund in its allocation peer group charges closer to four times that.
  • The equity sleeve is a plain large-cap U.S. portfolio of roughly 500 names. The Treasury futures ride alongside as collateralized exposure, not as a stock-picking bet.wisdomtree.com
  • Delivers its stated mandate with very little drift, and rates among the strongest builds in a crowded field of allocation funds.
  • Sibling GDE runs the same capital-efficient playbook at the same 0.20% fee, swapping the Treasury leg for gold, if you want the mechanism pointed elsewhere.
  • UPAR Cheaper than the typical fund in its allocation cohort (0.68% versus a 0.78% median) for a playbook that mostly lived behind institutional doors.
  • Leverage resets at each quarterly rebalance, not daily. The index targets 1.4 times the exposures of its unlevered risk-parity sibling, so day-to-day compounding is not the story.sec.gov
  • Four sleeves, four jobs: equities for growth, Treasuries and TIPS for contraction, producers and gold for inflation. The lower-risk sleeves get the biggest notional weights.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • NTSX Futures mean total market exposure runs above the fund's actual assets. When stocks and Treasuries fall together, the drop lands harder than in an unlevered balanced fund.
  • Trades thinly for a multi-billion-dollar fund. Limit orders and quieter parts of the session matter more here than with the mega-cap index crowd.
  • Income is a side effect of the structure, not the goal. Distributions come quarterly.
  • UPAR Leverage magnifies moves in both directions, and the filings say so plainly. This sits at the higher-volatility end of the allocation group.sec.gov
  • Treasuries and TIPS carry the largest notional weights, so interest rate swings move this portfolio more than they would a stock-heavy allocation fund.sec.gov
  • Thinly traded for its category, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than with the giant allocation funds.

Full NTSX profile⁠

Full UPAR profile⁠

NTSX vs UPAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NTSX vs UPAR Cost

Overpaying UPAR vs NTSX

$8,694

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NTSX 0.22%

    $4,558

  • UPAR 0.68%

    $13,252

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NTSX 0.22%
  • UPAR 0.68%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530UPAR $13,252NTSX $4,558

Year by year

YearNTSXUPAROverpaying
10$401$1,215$814
20$1,561$4,633$3,072
30$4,558$13,252$8,694

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%NTSX, cheaper
  • 0.68%UPAR
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

NTSX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

UPAR 11th cheapest of 19 funds

NTSX vs UPAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
NTSX 1.07%
UPAR 3.37%, better
Payout (12M)
NTSX $0.63
UPAR $0.52
Last payment
NTSX $0.16
UPAR $0.11
Ex-dividend
NTSX Sep 25, 2026
UPAR Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
NTSX Sep 29, 2026
UPAR Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
NTSX Quarterly
UPAR Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

NTSXQuarterly · 34 paymentsAll NTSX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 24, 2018 $0.08; Mar 26, 2019 $0.09; Jun 24, 2019 $0.10; Sep 24, 2019 $0.04; Dec 9, 2019 $0.11; Dec 23, 2019 $0.12; Mar 24, 2020 $0.04; Jun 23, 2020 $0.08; Sep 22, 2020 $0.09; Dec 21, 2020 $0.12; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 24, 2021 $0.09; Sep 24, 2021 $0.09; Dec 27, 2021 $0.10; Mar 25, 2022 $0.09; Jun 24, 2022 $0.12; Sep 26, 2022 $0.12; Dec 23, 2022 $0.12; Mar 27, 2023 $0.10; Jun 26, 2023 $0.11; Sep 25, 2023 $0.13; Dec 22, 2023 $0.14; Mar 22, 2024 $0.11; Jun 25, 2024 $0.13; Sep 25, 2024 $0.13; Dec 26, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2025 $0.16; Sep 25, 2025 $0.17; Dec 26, 2025 $0.17; Mar 26, 2026 $0.15; Jun 25, 2026 $0.16; Sep 25, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
UPARQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll UPAR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 28, 2022 $0.10; Jun 27, 2022 $0.20; Sep 27, 2022 $0.23; Dec 27, 2022 $0.09; Mar 28, 2023 $0.06; Jun 27, 2023 $0.15; Sep 26, 2023 $0.11; Dec 26, 2023 $0.09; Mar 25, 2024 $0.05; Jun 26, 2024 $0.19; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Dec 27, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.09; Jun 27, 2025 $0.24; Sep 29, 2025 $0.13; Dec 29, 2025 $0.05; Mar 27, 2026 $0.03; Jun 29, 2026 $0.33; Sep 28, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

NTSX vs UPAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NTSX 12.7%, betterUPAR 15.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NTSX 1.28, betterUPAR 0.62
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NTSX −31.3%UPAR −39.0%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NTSX 1.04UPAR 1.54

Popular comparisons

  • NTSXAvsCTAPA

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UPARCvsCTAPA

    UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.68% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsGDEB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UPARCvsGDEB

    UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.68% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsNTSIB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UPARCvsNTSIB

    UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.68% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.