Skip to content

CTAP vs UPAR

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF

UPARCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAP −0.55pt a year

CTAP0.13%UPAR0.68%

Avg volume · 30D

CTAP 8.9×the volume

CTAP86.8KUPAR9.81K

CTAP vs UPAR Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+21.5%CTAP+1.5%UPAR

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CTAP +21.5%. UPAR +1.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%10%15%25%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTAP 0.13%, better
UPAR 0.68%
Fund size
CTAP $167M
UPAR $55M
1Y total return
CTAP No data
UPAR +1.8%
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
UPAR 3.39%
Holdings
CTAP 42
UPAR 153
Avg volume (30D)
CTAP 86.8K sh, better
UPAR 9.81K sh
NAV per share
CTAP $30.26
UPAR $15.28
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59. UPAR: Cost 47, Risk 38, Mission 78, Tradability 34, Holdings 54, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAP, UPAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAPUPAR
Cost30% weightA100HigherC47
Mission25% weightNot scoredA78
Risk15% weightC45HigherD38
Tradability15% weightB67HigherD34
Holdings10% weightC42C54Higher
Durability5% weightB59HigherC54

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAP and UPAR are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

CTAP ranks 2nd and UPAR 10th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 10CGDTWisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold FundScore 43
  5. Rank 10CUPARUPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETFScore 43
  6. Rank 12CRSSTReturn Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

UPARCUPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF

In short

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

UPAR Risk parity built for four economic weathers, then dialed up. UPAR balances risk across global stocks, commodity producers and gold, TIPS and Treasuries, then levers the mix toward 160%-180% exposure, reset quarterly rather than daily.

Stated mandate

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

UPAR The actively managed Fund seeks positive returns during economic growth, capital preservation during economic contraction, and preservation of real returns during heightened inflation.

Why people hold it

  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.
  • UPAR Cheaper than the typical fund in its allocation cohort (0.68% versus a 0.78% median) for a playbook that mostly lived behind institutional doors.
  • Leverage resets at each quarterly rebalance, not daily. The index targets 1.4 times the exposures of its unlevered risk-parity sibling, so day-to-day compounding is not the story.sec.gov
  • Four sleeves, four jobs: equities for growth, Treasuries and TIPS for contraction, producers and gold for inflation. The lower-risk sleeves get the biggest notional weights.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us
  • UPAR Leverage magnifies moves in both directions, and the filings say so plainly. This sits at the higher-volatility end of the allocation group.sec.gov
  • Treasuries and TIPS carry the largest notional weights, so interest rate swings move this portfolio more than they would a stock-heavy allocation fund.sec.gov
  • Thinly traded for its category, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than with the giant allocation funds.

Full CTAP profile⁠

Full UPAR profile⁠

CTAP vs UPAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAP vs UPAR Cost

Overpaying UPAR vs CTAP

$10,526

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

  • UPAR 0.68%

    $13,252

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAP 0.13%
  • UPAR 0.68%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530UPAR $13,252CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearCTAPUPAROverpaying
10$238$1,215$977
20$930$4,633$3,703
30$2,726$13,252$10,526

Expense ratio

  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • 0.68%UPAR
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

UPAR 11th cheapest of 19 funds

CTAP vs UPAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
UPAR 3.39%
Payout (12M)
CTAP No data
UPAR $0.52
Last payment
CTAP $0.30
UPAR $0.11
Ex-dividend
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
UPAR Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
UPAR Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
CTAP Quarterly
UPAR Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
UPARQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll UPAR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 28, 2022 $0.10; Jun 27, 2022 $0.20; Sep 27, 2022 $0.23; Dec 27, 2022 $0.09; Mar 28, 2023 $0.06; Jun 27, 2023 $0.15; Sep 26, 2023 $0.11; Dec 26, 2023 $0.09; Mar 25, 2024 $0.05; Jun 26, 2024 $0.19; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Dec 27, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.09; Jun 27, 2025 $0.24; Sep 29, 2025 $0.13; Dec 29, 2025 $0.05; Mar 27, 2026 $0.03; Jun 29, 2026 $0.33; Sep 28, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

CTAP vs UPAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAP No dataUPAR 15.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAP No dataUPAR 0.62
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAP No dataUPAR −39.0%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAP 1.34UPAR 1.54

CTAP and UPAR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CTAPAvsNTSXA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UPARCvsNTSXA

    UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.68% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsGDEB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UPARCvsGDEB

    UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.68% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UPARCvsNTSIB

    UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.68% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.