URA ranks 4th and NUKX 9th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.
NUKX vs URA
URA −0.38pt a year
1.07%0.69%
URA 968.4×the volume
3.7K3.58M
NUKX vs URA Performance
−21.4%−23.5%
- NUKX 1.07%
- URA 0.69%, better
- NUKX $7M
- URA $4.44B
- NUKX
- URA −24.7%
- NUKX
- URA 6.07%
- NUKX 32
- URA 60
- NUKX 3.7K sh
- URA 3.58M sh, better
- NUKX $26.83
- URA $32.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUKX | URA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | B62Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | F22 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | D31 | C49Higher |
| Durability | D30 | A89Higher |
Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds
Same Category. NUKX and URA are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUKXD
URAB
In short
NUKX Uranium and nuclear stocks with a paycheck bolted on. NUKX puts capital appreciation first and current income second, a combination the pure-play miner funds skip. Launched in 2026, it is still a small, lightly traded newcomer.
URA The original US uranium ETF, trading since 2010, long before the nuclear theme got crowded. It holds roughly 50 names spanning miners and nuclear-component makers, so the reactor supply chain rides along with the yellowcake.
Stated mandate
NUKX The fund seeks capital appreciation as its primary objective and current income as its secondary objective.
URA The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. It concentrates at least 80% of assets in companies involved in uranium or nuclear-component activities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUKX vs URA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUKX vs URA Cost
Overpaying NUKX vs URA
$6,386
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUKX 1.07%
$19,815
URA 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUKX | URA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,232 | $649 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $4,697 | $2,349 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $13,429 | $6,386 |
- 1.07%NUKX
- 0.69%URA, cheaper
- Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
- Median 0.75%
URA 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
NUKX 9th cheapest of 9 funds
NUKX vs URA Dividends
- NUKX
- URA 6.07%
- NUKX
- URA $2.08
- NUKX $0.07
- URA $2.08
- NUKX Nov 3, 2026
- URA Dec 30, 2025
- NUKX Nov 4, 2026
- URA Jan 7, 2026
- NUKX Weekly
- URA Annual
Distribution history
NUKX vs URA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUKX URA 43.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- NUKX URA 0.38
- Worst fall
- NUKX URA −49.9%
- Market sensitivity
- NUKX 2.08URA 1.41
NUKX and URA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

