PLTM ranks 3rd and UX 8th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
PLTM vs UX
PLTM −0.27pt a year
0.50%0.77%
PLTM 33.9×the volume
138K4.07K
PLTM vs UX Performance
−9.2%−8.2%
- PLTM 0.50%, better
- UX 0.77%
- PLTM $150M
- UX $5M
- PLTM −9.2%
- UX −8.2%, better
- PLTM 0.00%
- UX
- PLTM 1
- UX 6
- PLTM 138K sh, better
- UX 4.07K sh
- PLTM $14.20
- UX $28.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PLTM | UX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67Higher | F20 |
| Mission | A94Higher | F22 |
| Risk | C44 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | C51Higher |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | C43 | C50Higher |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. PLTM and UX are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PLTMB
UXD
In short
PLTM Platinum, in a vault, sliced into shares. PLTM holds allocated bullion and charges 0.50% a year, undercutting the older platinum trust on fee, which is most of what separates two funds holding the same metal.
UX Uranium funds usually buy the miners. UX aims at the yellowcake itself, via swaps tied to Sprott's physical uranium trust and Yellow Cake plc: the first US-listed ETF built around the U3O8 price. Costs 0.77% a year, no waiver.
Stated mandate
PLTM The Trust seeks to reflect the price of platinum, less its expenses, through allocated physical platinum bullion.
UX The fund seeks exposure to changes in the price of physical uranium, including through swap agreements linked to uranium-related trusts and other reference assets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PLTM vs UX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PLTM vs UX Cost
Overpaying UX vs PLTM
$4,850
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PLTM 0.50%
$9,979
UX 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PLTM | UX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,371 | $471 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,205 | $1,745 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,829 | $4,850 |
- 0.50%PLTM, cheaper
- 0.77%UX
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
PLTM 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
UX 8th cheapest of 9 funds
PLTM vs UX Dividends
- PLTM 0.00%
- UX
- PLTM None
- UX
- PLTM
- UX $0.44
- PLTM
- UX Dec 30, 2025
- PLTM
- UX Dec 31, 2025
- PLTM
- UX Irregular
Distribution history
PLTM vs UX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PLTM 33.0%UX 31.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- PLTM 0.44UX 0.19
- Worst fall
- PLTM −48.4%UX −26.6%
- Market sensitivity
- PLTM 0.55UX 0.84
PLTM and UX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
