Skip to content

PLTM vs UX

GraniteShares Platinum Trust

PLTMBNYSE Arca

Roundhill Uranium ETF

UXDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PLTM −0.27pt a year

PLTM0.50%UX0.77%

Avg volume · 30D

PLTM 33.9×the volume

PLTM138KUX4.07K

PLTM vs UX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−9.2%PLTM−8.2%UX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PLTM −9.2%. UX −8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PLTM 0.50%, better
UX 0.77%
Fund size
PLTM $150M
UX $5M
1Y total return
PLTM −9.2%
UX −8.2%, better
Yield (12M)
PLTM 0.00%
UX No data
Holdings
PLTM 1
UX 6
Avg volume (30D)
PLTM 138K sh, better
UX 4.07K sh
NAV per share
PLTM $14.20
UX $28.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PLTM: Cost 67, Risk 44, Mission 94, Tradability 42, Holdings not scored, Durability 43. UX: Cost 20, Risk 66, Mission 22, Tradability 51, Holdings 100, Durability 50.
Pillar letters and Scores for PLTM, UX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPLTMUX
Cost30% weightB67HigherF20
Mission25% weightA94HigherF22
Risk15% weightC44B66Higher
Tradability15% weightC42C51Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA100
Durability5% weightC43C50Higher

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PLTM and UX are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

PLTM ranks 3rd and UX 8th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 3BPLTMGraniteShares Platinum TrustScore 65
  4. Rank 4BGLTRabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 7CYSAGTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 8DUXRoundhill Uranium ETFScore 34
  7. CTWONot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PLTMBGraniteShares Platinum Trust

UXDRoundhill Uranium ETF

In short

PLTM Platinum, in a vault, sliced into shares. PLTM holds allocated bullion and charges 0.50% a year, undercutting the older platinum trust on fee, which is most of what separates two funds holding the same metal.

UX Uranium funds usually buy the miners. UX aims at the yellowcake itself, via swaps tied to Sprott's physical uranium trust and Yellow Cake plc: the first US-listed ETF built around the U3O8 price. Costs 0.77% a year, no waiver.

Stated mandate

PLTM The Trust seeks to reflect the price of platinum, less its expenses, through allocated physical platinum bullion.

UX The fund seeks exposure to changes in the price of physical uranium, including through swap agreements linked to uranium-related trusts and other reference assets.

Why people hold it

  • PLTM At 0.50% a year it is the cheaper of the two US physical platinum trusts, and it sits under the median fee for physical commodity funds.
  • Allocated bars, not futures contracts: no roll calendar, no contango math, just platinum held for the trust.graniteshares.com
  • Simple mandate kept tightly since its 2018 launch: the platinum price less expenses, and one of the closer trackers among physical metal funds.
  • UX The first US-listed ETF designed to give exposure to the price of physical uranium (U3O8) rather than to the companies that mine it.roundhillinvestments.com
  • No yellowcake in a warehouse. Exposure comes from swaps referencing the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and Yellow Cake plc, collateralized with Treasury bills.sec.gov
  • Spot-uranium swaps sit in a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary, capped at 25% of assets at each fiscal quarter-end to keep the fund's 1940 Act tax treatment.roundhillinvestments.com

Worth knowing

  • PLTM One metal, one line of exposure. Platinum moves in its own lane and can swing hard, with nothing else inside the fund to cushion it.
  • No income here. Expenses are met out of the metal, so each share represents a slightly smaller slice of platinum as the years pass.
  • Volume is moderate rather than mega-trust deep, so spreads and limit orders matter more when you trade in size.
  • UX At 0.77% with no fee waiver, it charges more than the typical physical-commodity fund, and more than vault-held metal peers SIVR (0.30%) and SLV (0.50%).
  • Results lean on Sprott and Yellow Cake, which can trade at a premium or discount to their uranium holdings, so the fund can diverge from spot U3O8.sec.govroundhillinvestments.com
  • A 2025 launch with a small asset base, thin on-screen trading and non-diversified status under the 1940 Act, which can mean wider spreads than big vault-based funds.sec.gov

Full PLTM profile⁠

Full UX profile⁠

PLTM vs UX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PLTM vs UX Cost

Overpaying UX vs PLTM

$4,850

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PLTM 0.50%

    $9,979

  • UX 0.77%

    $14,829

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PLTM 0.50%
  • UX 0.77%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530UX $14,829PLTM $9,979

Year by year

YearPLTMUXOverpaying
10$900$1,371$471
20$3,460$5,205$1,745
30$9,979$14,829$4,850

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%PLTM, cheaper
  • 0.77%UX
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

PLTM 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

UX 8th cheapest of 9 funds

PLTM vs UX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PLTM 0.00%
UX No data
Payout (12M)
PLTM None
UX No data
Last payment
PLTM No data
UX $0.44
Ex-dividend
PLTM No data
UX Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
PLTM No data
UX Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
PLTM No data
UX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PLTMAll PLTM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UXIrregular · 1 paymentAll UX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.44. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

PLTM vs UX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PLTM 33.0%UX 31.3%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PLTM 0.44UX 0.19since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PLTM −48.4%UX −26.6%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PLTM 0.55UX 0.84

PLTM and UX in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PLTMBvsSIVRA

    GraniteShares Platinum Trust · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UXDvsSIVRA

    Roundhill Uranium ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLTMBvsSLVB

    GraniteShares Platinum Trust · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UXDvsSLVB

    Roundhill Uranium ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLTMBvsGLTRB

    GraniteShares Platinum Trust · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UXDvsGLTRB

    Roundhill Uranium ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.