SIVR ranks 1st and UX 8th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
SIVR vs UX
0.0%by weight
SIVR −0.47pt a year
0.30%0.77%
SIVR 362.1×the volume
1.47M4.07K
SIVR vs UX Performance
+1.5%−8.2%
- SIVR 0.30%, better
- UX 0.77%
- SIVR $3.45B
- UX $5M
- SIVR +1.5%, better
- UX −8.2%
- SIVR 1
- UX 6
- SIVR 1.47M sh, better
- UX 4.07K sh
- SIVR $47.57
- UX $28.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SIVR | UX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F20 |
| Mission | A89Higher | F22 |
| Risk | D37 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C52Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | C50 |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. SIVR and UX are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SIVRA
UXD
In short
SIVR Silver bullion in a vault, wrapped in a ticker. SIVR has done that one job since 2009 at 0.30% a year, half the going rate for physical metal funds, and fee is most of the tracking gap here.
UX Uranium funds usually buy the miners. UX aims at the yellowcake itself, via swaps tied to Sprott's physical uranium trust and Yellow Cake plc: the first US-listed ETF built around the U3O8 price. Costs 0.77% a year, no waiver.
Stated mandate
SIVR The Trust seeks to track the price of physical silver, after deducting its expenses.
UX The fund seeks exposure to changes in the price of physical uranium, including through swap agreements linked to uranium-related trusts and other reference assets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SIVR vs UX Holdings
How SIVR and UX differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SIVR and 0.0% of UX.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SIVR.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SIVR.
Concentration
- SIVR100.0%
- UX186.9%
- SIVR1
- UX4
Asset class
- SIVR
- Alternatives
- UX
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in SIVR1
- In both0
- Only in UX4
Only in SIVR
1 security, 100% of SIVR by weight
- Physical Silver100.00%
Only in UX
4 securities, 100% of UX by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 12/03/202681.80%
- Sprott Physical Uranium Trust19.93%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20314.15%
- British Pounds<0.01%
Weight gaps
SIVR and UX share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SIVR vs UX Cost
Overpaying UX vs SIVR
$8,680
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SIVR 0.30%
$6,149
UX 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SIVR | UX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,371 | $826 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,205 | $3,092 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $14,829 | $8,680 |
- 0.30%SIVR, cheaper
- 0.77%UX
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
SIVR cheapest of 9 funds
UX 8th cheapest of 9 funds
SIVR vs UX Dividends
- SIVR None
- UX
- SIVR
- UX $0.44
- SIVR
- UX Dec 30, 2025
- SIVR
- UX Dec 31, 2025
- SIVR
- UX Irregular
Distribution history
SIVR vs UX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SIVR 37.0%UX 31.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SIVR 0.75UX 0.19
- Worst fall
- SIVR −57.7%UX −26.6%
- Market sensitivity
- SIVR 1.26UX 0.84
SIVR and UX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


