GLTR ranks 4th and UX 8th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
GLTR vs UX
GLTR −0.17pt a year
0.60%0.77%
GLTR 15.0×the volume
61.1K4.07K
GLTR vs UX Performance
−3.7%−8.2%
- GLTR 0.60%, better
- UX 0.77%
- GLTR $2.32B
- UX $5M
- GLTR −3.7%, better
- UX −8.2%
- GLTR 1
- UX 6
- GLTR 61.1K sh, better
- UX 4.07K sh
- GLTR $167.14
- UX $28.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLTR | UX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41Higher | F20 |
| Mission | A92Higher | F22 |
| Risk | B62 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B57Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | C50 |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. GLTR and UX are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLTRB
UXD
In short
GLTR Gold, silver, platinum and palladium in one wrapper, all held as physical bullion. GLTR is the rare one-ticker version of the entire precious-metals complex, running since 2010, and it owns the metal instead of renting exposure through futures.
UX Uranium funds usually buy the miners. UX aims at the yellowcake itself, via swaps tied to Sprott's physical uranium trust and Yellow Cake plc: the first US-listed ETF built around the U3O8 price. Costs 0.77% a year, no waiver.
Stated mandate
GLTR The Trust holds a physical bullion basket containing gold, silver, platinum, and palladium in specified proportions, with baskets issued against bullion deposits and bullion distributed on redemptions.
UX The fund seeks exposure to changes in the price of physical uranium, including through swap agreements linked to uranium-related trusts and other reference assets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLTR vs UX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLTR vs UX Cost
Overpaying UX vs GLTR
$3,012
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLTR 0.60%
$11,817
UX 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLTR | UX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,371 | $295 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $5,205 | $1,089 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $14,829 | $3,012 |
- 0.60%GLTR, cheaper
- 0.77%UX
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
GLTR 5th cheapest of 9 funds
UX 8th cheapest of 9 funds
GLTR vs UX Dividends
- GLTR None
- UX
- GLTR
- UX $0.44
- GLTR
- UX Dec 30, 2025
- GLTR
- UX Dec 31, 2025
- GLTR
- UX Irregular
Distribution history
GLTR vs UX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLTR 24.1%UX 31.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLTR 0.82UX 0.19
- Worst fall
- GLTR −41.9%UX −26.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GLTR 0.68UX 0.84
GLTR and UX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
