Skip to content

GLTR vs UX

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

GLTRBNYSE Arca

Roundhill Uranium ETF

UXDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

GLTR −0.17pt a year

GLTR0.60%UX0.77%

Avg volume · 30D

GLTR 15.0×the volume

GLTR61.1KUX4.07K

GLTR vs UX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−3.7%GLTR−8.2%UX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GLTR −3.7%. UX −8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GLTR 0.60%, better
UX 0.77%
Fund size
GLTR $2.32B
UX $5M
1Y total return
GLTR −3.7%, better
UX −8.2%
Holdings
GLTR 1
UX 6
Avg volume (30D)
GLTR 61.1K sh, better
UX 4.07K sh
NAV per share
GLTR $167.14
UX $28.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLTR: Cost 41, Risk 62, Mission 92, Tradability 57, Holdings not scored, Durability 69. UX: Cost 20, Risk 66, Mission 22, Tradability 51, Holdings 100, Durability 50.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLTR, UX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLTRUX
Cost30% weightC41HigherF20
Mission25% weightA92HigherF22
Risk15% weightB62B66Higher
Tradability15% weightB57HigherC51
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA100
Durability5% weightB69HigherC50

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GLTR and UX are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

GLTR ranks 4th and UX 8th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 3BPLTMGraniteShares Platinum TrustScore 65
  4. Rank 4BGLTRabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BPPLTabrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 7CYSAGTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 8DUXRoundhill Uranium ETFScore 34
  8. CTWONot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLTRBabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

UXDRoundhill Uranium ETF

In short

GLTR Gold, silver, platinum and palladium in one wrapper, all held as physical bullion. GLTR is the rare one-ticker version of the entire precious-metals complex, running since 2010, and it owns the metal instead of renting exposure through futures.

UX Uranium funds usually buy the miners. UX aims at the yellowcake itself, via swaps tied to Sprott's physical uranium trust and Yellow Cake plc: the first US-listed ETF built around the U3O8 price. Costs 0.77% a year, no waiver.

Stated mandate

GLTR The Trust holds a physical bullion basket containing gold, silver, platinum, and palladium in specified proportions, with baskets issued against bullion deposits and bullion distributed on redemptions.

UX The fund seeks exposure to changes in the price of physical uranium, including through swap agreements linked to uranium-related trusts and other reference assets.

Why people hold it

  • GLTR Four metals, one ticker: the trust holds physical gold, silver, platinum and palladium in set proportions, with baskets created and redeemed in bullion rather than cash.aberdeeninvestments.com
  • Trading since 2010 and now a multi-billion-dollar trust: one of the longest-standing ways to own the full metals basket inside a brokerage account.
  • Because it holds bullion outright, its results have tracked the underlying metals basket closely, less expenses, among the tighter records in the physical-commodity group.
  • The 0.60% fee sits right at the median for physically backed commodity funds, so the four-metal convenience is not priced above the category norm.
  • UX The first US-listed ETF designed to give exposure to the price of physical uranium (U3O8) rather than to the companies that mine it.roundhillinvestments.com
  • No yellowcake in a warehouse. Exposure comes from swaps referencing the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and Yellow Cake plc, collateralized with Treasury bills.sec.gov
  • Spot-uranium swaps sit in a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary, capped at 25% of assets at each fiscal quarter-end to keep the fund's 1940 Act tax treatment.roundhillinvestments.com

Worth knowing

  • GLTR Single-metal siblings cost less: SIVR charges 0.30% and SLV 0.50%. Bundling four metals into one line item costs a little more than buying one.
  • The proportions are set by the trust, and platinum and palladium bring industrial demand swings a gold-only holding does not. You cannot dial the mix yourself.
  • No income here. It is a grantor trust holding metal, pays no distributions, and volume is moderate rather than heavy, so spreads deserve a glance.
  • UX At 0.77% with no fee waiver, it charges more than the typical physical-commodity fund, and more than vault-held metal peers SIVR (0.30%) and SLV (0.50%).
  • Results lean on Sprott and Yellow Cake, which can trade at a premium or discount to their uranium holdings, so the fund can diverge from spot U3O8.sec.govroundhillinvestments.com
  • A 2025 launch with a small asset base, thin on-screen trading and non-diversified status under the 1940 Act, which can mean wider spreads than big vault-based funds.sec.gov

Full GLTR profile⁠

Full UX profile⁠

GLTR vs UX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GLTR vs UX Cost

Overpaying UX vs GLTR

$3,012

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GLTR 0.60%

    $11,817

  • UX 0.77%

    $14,829

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GLTR 0.60%
  • UX 0.77%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530UX $14,829GLTR $11,817

Year by year

YearGLTRUXOverpaying
10$1,076$1,371$295
20$4,116$5,205$1,089
30$11,817$14,829$3,012

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%GLTR, cheaper
  • 0.77%UX
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

GLTR 5th cheapest of 9 funds

UX 8th cheapest of 9 funds

GLTR vs UX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GLTR None
UX No data
Last payment
GLTR No data
UX $0.44
Ex-dividend
GLTR No data
UX Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
GLTR No data
UX Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
GLTR No data
UX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GLTRAll GLTR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UXIrregular · 1 paymentAll UX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.44. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

GLTR vs UX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLTR 24.1%UX 31.3%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLTR 0.82UX 0.19since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLTR −41.9%UX −26.6%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GLTR 0.68UX 0.84

GLTR and UX in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GLTRBvsSIVRA

    abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UXDvsSIVRA

    Roundhill Uranium ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLTRBvsSLVB

    abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UXDvsSLVB

    Roundhill Uranium ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLTRBvsPLTMB

    abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UXDvsPLTMB

    Roundhill Uranium ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.