Skip to content

SLV vs UX

iShares Silver Trust

SLVBNYSE Arca

Roundhill Uranium ETF

UXDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

SLV −0.27pt a year

SLV0.50%UX0.77%

Avg volume · 30D

SLV 4015.2×the volume

SLV16.3MUX4.07K

SLV vs UX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.3%SLV−8.2%UX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. SLV +1.3%. UX −8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.25%50%75%100%125%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SLV 0.50%, better
UX 0.77%
Fund size
SLV $25.2B
UX $5M
1Y total return
SLV +1.3%, better
UX −8.2%
Holdings
SLV 1
UX 6
Avg volume (30D)
SLV 16.3M sh, better
UX 4.07K sh
NAV per share
SLV $45.22
UX $28.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SLV: Cost 67, Risk 37, Mission 89, Tradability 71, Holdings not scored, Durability 84. UX: Cost 20, Risk 66, Mission 22, Tradability 51, Holdings 100, Durability 50.
Pillar letters and Scores for SLV, UX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSLVUX
Cost30% weightB67HigherF20
Mission25% weightA89HigherF22
Risk15% weightD37B66Higher
Tradability15% weightA71HigherC51
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA100
Durability5% weightA84HigherC50

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SLV and UX are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

SLV ranks 2nd and UX 8th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 3BPLTMGraniteShares Platinum TrustScore 65
  4. Rank 7CYSAGTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 8DUXRoundhill Uranium ETFScore 34
  6. CTWONot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SLVBiShares Silver Trust

UXDRoundhill Uranium ETF

In short

SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.

UX Uranium funds usually buy the miners. UX aims at the yellowcake itself, via swaps tied to Sprott's physical uranium trust and Yellow Cake plc: the first US-listed ETF built around the U3O8 price. Costs 0.77% a year, no waiver.

Stated mandate

SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.

UX The fund seeks exposure to changes in the price of physical uranium, including through swap agreements linked to uranium-related trusts and other reference assets.

Why people hold it

  • SLV The deep end of the silver pool: running since 2006, a multi-billion-dollar trust, and very actively traded, which is what keeps spreads tight and the options market busy.
  • Metal, not machinery. Assets are physical silver held by a custodian and priced off the LBMA Silver Price. No futures roll, no miner earnings, no swap counterparty.sec.gov
  • 0.50% a year, under the typical physical-metal trust, and the design is about as plain as it gets: bullion price minus expenses, tracked closely.
  • UX The first US-listed ETF designed to give exposure to the price of physical uranium (U3O8) rather than to the companies that mine it.roundhillinvestments.com
  • No yellowcake in a warehouse. Exposure comes from swaps referencing the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and Yellow Cake plc, collateralized with Treasury bills.sec.gov
  • Spot-uranium swaps sit in a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary, capped at 25% of assets at each fiscal quarter-end to keep the fund's 1940 Act tax treatment.roundhillinvestments.com

Worth knowing

  • SLV SIVR runs the same physical-silver idea for 0.30%. The extra fee here buys size and trading depth, not different metal.
  • No income. Bullion pays nothing, and the trustee sells silver to cover expenses, so the metal behind each share slowly shrinks.sec.gov
  • One metal, one price. Nothing inside the trust cushions a silver drawdown, and silver is a jumpy market by nature.
  • UX At 0.77% with no fee waiver, it charges more than the typical physical-commodity fund, and more than vault-held metal peers SIVR (0.30%) and SLV (0.50%).
  • Results lean on Sprott and Yellow Cake, which can trade at a premium or discount to their uranium holdings, so the fund can diverge from spot U3O8.sec.govroundhillinvestments.com
  • A 2025 launch with a small asset base, thin on-screen trading and non-diversified status under the 1940 Act, which can mean wider spreads than big vault-based funds.sec.gov

Full SLV profile⁠

Full UX profile⁠

SLV vs UX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SLV vs UX Cost

Overpaying UX vs SLV

$4,850

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SLV 0.50%

    $9,979

  • UX 0.77%

    $14,829

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SLV 0.50%
  • UX 0.77%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530UX $14,829SLV $9,979

Year by year

YearSLVUXOverpaying
10$900$1,371$471
20$3,460$5,205$1,745
30$9,979$14,829$4,850

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%SLV, cheaper
  • 0.77%UX
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

UX 8th cheapest of 9 funds

SLV vs UX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
SLV None
UX No data
Last payment
SLV No data
UX $0.44
Ex-dividend
SLV No data
UX Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
SLV No data
UX Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
SLV No data
UX Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

SLVAll SLV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UXIrregular · 1 paymentAll UX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.44. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

SLV vs UX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SLV 37.0%UX 31.3%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SLV 0.75UX 0.19since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SLV −57.8%UX −26.6%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SLV 1.26UX 0.84

SLV and UX in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SLVBvsSIVRA

    iShares Silver Trust · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UXDvsSIVRA

    Roundhill Uranium ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsPLTMB

    iShares Silver Trust · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UXDvsPLTMB

    Roundhill Uranium ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsGLTRB

    iShares Silver Trust · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UXDvsGLTRB

    Roundhill Uranium ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.