SLV ranks 2nd and UX 8th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
SLV vs UX
SLV −0.27pt a year
0.50%0.77%
SLV 4015.2×the volume
16.3M4.07K
SLV vs UX Performance
+1.3%−8.2%
- SLV 0.50%, better
- UX 0.77%
- SLV $25.2B
- UX $5M
- SLV +1.3%, better
- UX −8.2%
- SLV 1
- UX 6
- SLV 16.3M sh, better
- UX 4.07K sh
- SLV $45.22
- UX $28.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SLV | UX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67Higher | F20 |
| Mission | A89Higher | F22 |
| Risk | D37 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | A71Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | A84Higher | C50 |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. SLV and UX are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SLVB
UXD
In short
SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.
UX Uranium funds usually buy the miners. UX aims at the yellowcake itself, via swaps tied to Sprott's physical uranium trust and Yellow Cake plc: the first US-listed ETF built around the U3O8 price. Costs 0.77% a year, no waiver.
Stated mandate
SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.
UX The fund seeks exposure to changes in the price of physical uranium, including through swap agreements linked to uranium-related trusts and other reference assets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SLV vs UX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SLV vs UX Cost
Overpaying UX vs SLV
$4,850
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SLV 0.50%
$9,979
UX 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SLV | UX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,371 | $471 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,205 | $1,745 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,829 | $4,850 |
- 0.50%SLV, cheaper
- 0.77%UX
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
UX 8th cheapest of 9 funds
SLV vs UX Dividends
- SLV None
- UX
- SLV
- UX $0.44
- SLV
- UX Dec 30, 2025
- SLV
- UX Dec 31, 2025
- SLV
- UX Irregular
Distribution history
SLV vs UX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SLV 37.0%UX 31.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SLV 0.75UX 0.19
- Worst fall
- SLV −57.8%UX −26.6%
- Market sensitivity
- SLV 1.26UX 0.84
SLV and UX in the news
Price vs Value
iShares silver fund's 1.38% discount was a morning price

First-Year Review
Kurv's silver fund paid $7.70 in year one and still lagged the metal



Price vs Value
URNJ closed 1.57% below the value of its miners Friday


Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.