BATT ranks 4th and MOTO 5th of 7 funds in the EV & Battery Category.
BATT vs MOTO
BATT −0.09pt a year
0.59%0.68%
BATT 190.3×the volume
41.5K218
MOTO +10.9pt
−5.7%+5.2%
BATT vs MOTO Performance
−25.6%+28.7%
- BATT 0.59%, better
- MOTO 0.68%
- BATT $92M
- MOTO $9M
- BATT −6.2%
- MOTO +7.3%, better
- BATT 2.02%, better
- MOTO 0.99%
- BATT 54
- MOTO 40
- BATT 41.5K sh, better
- MOTO 218 sh
- BATT $12.76
- MOTO $59.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BATT | MOTO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62Higher | C41 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C40 | A81Higher |
| Tradability | C46Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | D30 | C52Higher |
| Durability | B63Higher | D32 |
Rank among EV & Battery funds
Same Category. BATT and MOTO are both graded against the same 7 EV & Battery funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BATTC
MOTOC
In short
BATT Most EV funds buy the carmakers. BATT buys the battery, tracking a global index of roughly 50 lithium and battery-technology companies. It has been running since 2018 and charges less than the typical fund in its category.
MOTO A stock-picker's run at the EV and self-driving theme: about 40 names, roughly equal weight, picked by Guinness Atkinson's managers. Fee is 0.68%, net of a waiver through June 30, 2029.
Stated mandate
BATT The Fund seeks to track the EQM Lithium & Battery Technology Index before fees and expenses through passive indexing; it normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising the Index.
MOTO The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in publicly traded equity securities of domestic or foreign companies developing or producing smart-transportation products and systems, including autonomous or electric vehicles and smart transportation networks. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in these companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BATT vs MOTO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BATT vs MOTO Cost
Overpaying MOTO vs BATT
$1,617
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BATT 0.59%
$11,635
MOTO 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BATT | MOTO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,215 | $157 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,633 | $582 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $13,252 | $1,617 |
- 0.59%BATT, cheaper
- 0.68%MOTO
- Middle half of EV & Battery funds
- Median 0.68%
BATT 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
MOTO 4th cheapest of 7 funds
BATT vs MOTO Dividends
- BATT 2.02%, better
- MOTO 0.99%
- BATT $0.26
- MOTO $0.56
- BATT $0.26
- MOTO $0.56
- BATT Dec 30, 2025
- MOTO Dec 12, 2025
- BATT Dec 31, 2025
- MOTO Dec 22, 2025
- BATT Annual
- MOTO Annual
Distribution history
BATT vs MOTO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BATT
- MOTO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BATT 27.2%MOTO 20.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BATT 0.37MOTO 0.74, better
- Worst fall
- BATT −61.9%MOTO −37.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BATT 1.49MOTO 1.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.