CTAP ranks 2nd and RSBY 14th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
CTAP vs RSBY
CTAP −0.88pt a year
0.13%1.01%
CTAP 4.6×the volume
86.8K18.8K
CTAP vs RSBY Performance
+21.5%+20.7%
- CTAP 0.13%, better
- RSBY 1.01%
- CTAP $167M
- RSBY $47M
- CTAP
- RSBY +16.1%
- CTAP
- RSBY 1.72%
- CTAP 42
- RSBY 20
- CTAP 86.8K sh, better
- RSBY 18.8K sh
- CTAP $30.26
- RSBY $18.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTAP | RSBY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | C42Higher | F20 |
| Durability | B59Higher | C44 |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. CTAP and RSBY are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CTAPA
RSBYD
In short
CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.
RSBY A core bond fund with a second engine bolted on. The name says it: broad U.S. bonds plus a futures-yield sleeve in one ticker, aiming at the total return of the fixed income market at alternatives-style pricing.
Stated mandate
CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.
RSBY The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by pursuing the total return of the broad U.S. fixed income market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CTAP vs RSBY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTAP vs RSBY Cost
Overpaying RSBY vs CTAP
$16,124
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTAP 0.13%
$2,726
RSBY 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTAP | RSBY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $238 | $1,780 | $1,542 |
| 20 | $930 | $6,686 | $5,756 |
| 30 | $2,726 | $18,850 | $16,124 |
- 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
- 1.01%RSBY
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
CTAP cheapest of 19 funds
RSBY 15th cheapest of 19 funds
CTAP vs RSBY Dividends
- CTAP
- RSBY 1.72%
- CTAP
- RSBY $0.32
- CTAP $0.30
- RSBY $0.32
- CTAP Sep 25, 2026
- RSBY Dec 29, 2025
- CTAP Sep 30, 2026
- RSBY Dec 30, 2025
- CTAP Quarterly
- RSBY Annual
Distribution history
CTAP vs RSBY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTAP RSBY 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTAP RSBY −0.32
- Worst fall
- CTAP RSBY −23.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CTAP 1.34RSBY −0.05
CTAP and RSBY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.13% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


