GDE ranks 3rd and RSBY 14th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
GDE vs RSBY
GDE −0.81pt a year
0.20%1.01%
GDE 6.7×the volume
125K18.8K
GDE vs RSBY Performance
+3.1%+14.3%
- GDE 0.20%, better
- RSBY 1.01%
- GDE $375M
- RSBY $47M
- GDE +3.1%
- RSBY +14.3%, better
- GDE 16.98%, better
- RSBY 1.74%
- GDE 498
- RSBY 21
- GDE 125K sh, better
- RSBY 18.8K sh
- GDE $51.01
- RSBY $18.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDE | RSBY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | F17 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | D25 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | F20 |
| Durability | A78Higher | C44 |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. GDE and RSBY are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDEB
RSBYD
In short
GDE Gold and US large caps, stacked on the same dollar. GDE holds roughly 500 US large-cap stocks and layers gold futures on top, so the metal rides along instead of crowding equities out of the portfolio.
RSBY A core bond fund with a second engine bolted on. The name says it: broad U.S. bonds plus a futures-yield sleeve in one ticker, aiming at the total return of the fixed income market at alternatives-style pricing.
Stated mandate
GDE The fund seeks total return by investing directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary in U.S.-listed gold futures contracts and U.S. large-cap equity securities.
RSBY The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by pursuing the total return of the broad U.S. fixed income market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDE vs RSBY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDE vs RSBY Cost
Overpaying RSBY vs GDE
$14,695
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDE 0.20%
$4,155
RSBY 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDE | RSBY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,780 | $1,415 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $6,686 | $5,265 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $18,850 | $14,695 |
- 0.20%GDE, cheaper
- 1.01%RSBY
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
GDE 2nd cheapest of 19 funds
RSBY 15th cheapest of 19 funds
GDE vs RSBY Dividends
- GDE 16.98%, better
- RSBY 1.74%
- GDE $8.73
- RSBY $0.32
- GDE $8.58
- RSBY $0.32
- GDE Oct 27, 2026
- RSBY Dec 29, 2025
- GDE Oct 29, 2026
- RSBY Dec 30, 2025
- GDE Annual
- RSBY Annual
Distribution history
GDE vs RSBY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDE 20.7%RSBY 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GDE 1.58RSBY −0.32
- Worst fall
- GDE −32.0%RSBY −23.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GDE 1.00RSBY −0.05
GDE and RSBY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
