GLTR ranks 4th and PALL 6th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
GLTR vs PALL
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.60%0.60%
PALL 14.1×the volume
61.1K859K
GLTR +6.0pt
+10.1%+4.1%
GLTR vs PALL Performance
+85.0%−52.1%
- GLTR 0.60%
- PALL 0.60%
- GLTR $2.32B
- PALL $505M
- GLTR −3.7%, better
- PALL −32.5%
- GLTR 1
- PALL 1
- GLTR 61.1K sh
- PALL 859K sh, better
- GLTR $167.14
- PALL $17.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLTR | PALL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | C41 |
| Mission | A92Higher | A78 |
| Risk | B62Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | B57 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69Higher | B59 |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. GLTR and PALL are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLTRB
PALLC
In short
GLTR Gold, silver, platinum and palladium in one wrapper, all held as physical bullion. GLTR is the rare one-ticker version of the entire precious-metals complex, running since 2010, and it owns the metal instead of renting exposure through futures.
PALL Palladium bars, not palladium futures. Running since 2010, this abrdn trust aims to reflect the price of physical palladium after expenses: one metal, one price, no roll schedule to babysit.
Stated mandate
GLTR The Trust holds a physical bullion basket containing gold, silver, platinum, and palladium in specified proportions, with baskets issued against bullion deposits and bullion distributed on redemptions.
PALL The Trust's objective is for its Shares to reflect the price performance of physical palladium, after deducting Trust expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLTR vs PALL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLTR vs PALL Cost
Same expense ratio
$11,817
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLTR 0.60%
$11,817
PALL 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLTR | PALL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,076 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $4,116 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $11,817 |
- 0.60%GLTR
- 0.60%PALL
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
GLTR 5th cheapest of 9 funds
PALL 5th cheapest of 9 funds
GLTR vs PALL Dividends
- GLTR None
- PALL None
Distribution history
GLTR vs PALL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GLTR
- PALL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLTR 24.1%, betterPALL 32.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLTR 0.82, betterPALL −0.13
- Worst fall
- GLTR −41.9%, betterPALL −73.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GLTR 0.68PALL 0.46
GLTR and PALL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
