PLTM ranks 3rd and PALL 6th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
PALL vs PLTM
PLTM −0.10pt a year
0.60%0.50%
PALL 6.2×the volume
859K138K
PLTM +20.3pt
−13.7%+6.6%
PALL vs PLTM Performance
−52.1%+37.8%
- PALL 0.60%
- PLTM 0.50%, better
- PALL $505M
- PLTM $150M
- PALL −32.5%
- PLTM −9.2%, better
- PALL
- PLTM 0.00%
- PALL 1
- PLTM 1
- PALL 859K sh, better
- PLTM 138K sh
- PALL $17.62
- PLTM $14.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PALL | PLTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | B67Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D26 | C44Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59Higher | C43 |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. PALL and PLTM are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PALLC
PLTMB
In short
PALL Palladium bars, not palladium futures. Running since 2010, this abrdn trust aims to reflect the price of physical palladium after expenses: one metal, one price, no roll schedule to babysit.
PLTM Platinum, in a vault, sliced into shares. PLTM holds allocated bullion and charges 0.50% a year, undercutting the older platinum trust on fee, which is most of what separates two funds holding the same metal.
Stated mandate
PALL The Trust's objective is for its Shares to reflect the price performance of physical palladium, after deducting Trust expenses.
PLTM The Trust seeks to reflect the price of platinum, less its expenses, through allocated physical platinum bullion.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PALL vs PLTM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PALL vs PLTM Cost
Overpaying PALL vs PLTM
$1,838
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PALL 0.60%
$11,817
PLTM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PALL | PLTM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $900 | $176 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $3,460 | $656 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $9,979 | $1,838 |
- 0.60%PALL
- 0.50%PLTM, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
PLTM 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
PALL 5th cheapest of 9 funds
PALL vs PLTM Dividends
- PALL
- PLTM 0.00%
- PALL None
- PLTM None
Distribution history
PALL vs PLTM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PALL
- PLTM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PALL 32.4%, betterPLTM 33.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PALL −0.13PLTM 0.44, better
- Worst fall
- PALL −73.6%PLTM −48.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PALL 0.46PLTM 0.55
PALL and PLTM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
