Skip to content

PALL vs PLTM

abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF

PALLCNYSE Arca

GraniteShares Platinum Trust

PLTMBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PLTM −0.10pt a year

PALL0.60%PLTM0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

PALL 6.2×the volume

PALL859KPLTM138K

5Y return · a year

PLTM +20.3pt

PALL−13.7%PLTM+6.6%

PALL vs PLTM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−52.1%PALL+37.8%PLTM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PALL −52.1%. PLTM +37.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%100%150%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PALL 0.60%
PLTM 0.50%, better
Fund size
PALL $505M
PLTM $150M
1Y total return
PALL −32.5%
PLTM −9.2%, better
Yield (12M)
PALL No data
PLTM 0.00%
Holdings
PALL 1
PLTM 1
Avg volume (30D)
PALL 859K sh, better
PLTM 138K sh
NAV per share
PALL $17.62
PLTM $14.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PALL: Cost 41, Risk 26, Mission 78, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 59. PLTM: Cost 67, Risk 44, Mission 94, Tradability 42, Holdings not scored, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for PALL, PLTM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPALLPLTM
Cost30% weightC41B67Higher
Mission25% weightA78A94Higher
Risk15% weightD26C44Higher
Tradability15% weightB59HigherC42
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB59HigherC43

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PALL and PLTM are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

PLTM ranks 3rd and PALL 6th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 3BPLTMGraniteShares Platinum TrustScore 65
  4. Rank 4BGLTRabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BPPLTabrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 6CPALLabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 7CYSAGTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PALLCabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF

PLTMBGraniteShares Platinum Trust

In short

PALL Palladium bars, not palladium futures. Running since 2010, this abrdn trust aims to reflect the price of physical palladium after expenses: one metal, one price, no roll schedule to babysit.

PLTM Platinum, in a vault, sliced into shares. PLTM holds allocated bullion and charges 0.50% a year, undercutting the older platinum trust on fee, which is most of what separates two funds holding the same metal.

Stated mandate

PALL The Trust's objective is for its Shares to reflect the price performance of physical palladium, after deducting Trust expenses.

PLTM The Trust seeks to reflect the price of platinum, less its expenses, through allocated physical platinum bullion.

Why people hold it

  • PALL One job, stated plainly: shares reflect the price of physical palladium after trust expenses. No futures ladder, no index committee, no tracking basket to decode.
  • Trading since 2010 and an actively traded name in its physical-commodity group, so getting a position on or off is usually straightforward.
  • Part of abrdn's physical metals shelf alongside silver (SIVR), platinum (PPLT) and the GLTR precious-metals basket, so shifting metals keeps you in one familiar structure.
  • PLTM At 0.50% a year it is the cheaper of the two US physical platinum trusts, and it sits under the median fee for physical commodity funds.
  • Allocated bars, not futures contracts: no roll calendar, no contango math, just platinum held for the trust.graniteshares.com
  • Simple mandate kept tightly since its 2018 launch: the platinum price less expenses, and one of the closer trackers among physical metal funds.

Worth knowing

  • PALL The 0.60% expense ratio is the median for physically backed metal trusts, not a bargain. SIVR charges 0.30%, SLV and PLTM 0.50%, though those hold different metals.
  • Nothing gets paid out. The whole result is the metal's price minus the trust's expenses, so there's no income to soften a flat stretch.
  • One metal, one mood. This sits among the more volatile members of its physical-metals group, with no basket alongside it to smooth a rough palladium run.
  • PLTM One metal, one line of exposure. Platinum moves in its own lane and can swing hard, with nothing else inside the fund to cushion it.
  • No income here. Expenses are met out of the metal, so each share represents a slightly smaller slice of platinum as the years pass.
  • Volume is moderate rather than mega-trust deep, so spreads and limit orders matter more when you trade in size.

Full PALL profile⁠

Full PLTM profile⁠

PALL vs PLTM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PALL vs PLTM Cost

Overpaying PALL vs PLTM

$1,838

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PALL 0.60%

    $11,817

  • PLTM 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PALL 0.60%
  • PLTM 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PALL $11,817PLTM $9,979

Year by year

YearPALLPLTMOverpaying
10$1,076$900$176
20$4,116$3,460$656
30$11,817$9,979$1,838

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%PALL
  • 0.50%PLTM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

PLTM 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

PALL 5th cheapest of 9 funds

PALL vs PLTM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PALL No data
PLTM 0.00%
Payout (12M)
PALL None
PLTM None

Distribution history

Per share, 2010 to 2015, same scale for both

PALLAll PALL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PLTM13 paymentsAll PLTM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 13 payments from 2010 to 2015. Jun 22, 2010 $0.08; Dec 21, 2010 $0.04; Jun 21, 2011 $0.02; Dec 21, 2011 $0.24; Sep 21, 2012 $0.04; Dec 21, 2012 $0.02; Mar 21, 2013 $0.005; Sep 20, 2013 $0.01; Dec 18, 2013 $0.19; Mar 25, 2014 $0.04; Jun 24, 2014 $0.07; Dec 23, 2014 $0.17; Jun 24, 2015 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520122015

PALL vs PLTM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PALL
  • PLTM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PALL −73.6% · Aug 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PALL 32.4%, betterPLTM 33.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PALL −0.13PLTM 0.44, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PALL −73.6%PLTM −48.4%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PALL 0.46PLTM 0.55

PALL and PLTM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PALLCvsSIVRA

    abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLTMBvsSIVRA

    GraniteShares Platinum Trust · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PALLCvsSLVB

    abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLTMBvsSLVB

    GraniteShares Platinum Trust · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PALLCvsGLTRB

    abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLTMBvsGLTRB

    GraniteShares Platinum Trust · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.