SIVR ranks 1st and PALL 6th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
PALL vs SIVR
SIVR −0.30pt a year
0.60%0.30%
SIVR 1.7×the volume
859K1.47M
SIVR +6.3pt
+4.1%+10.4%
PALL vs SIVR Performance
−52.1%+103.7%
- PALL 0.60%
- SIVR 0.30%, better
- PALL $505M
- SIVR $3.45B
- PALL −32.5%
- SIVR +1.5%, better
- PALL 1
- SIVR 1
- PALL 859K sh
- SIVR 1.47M sh, better
- PALL $17.62
- SIVR $47.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PALL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A89Higher |
| Risk | D26 | D37Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | A73Higher |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. PALL and SIVR are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PALLC
SIVRA
In short
PALL Palladium bars, not palladium futures. Running since 2010, this abrdn trust aims to reflect the price of physical palladium after expenses: one metal, one price, no roll schedule to babysit.
SIVR Silver bullion in a vault, wrapped in a ticker. SIVR has done that one job since 2009 at 0.30% a year, half the going rate for physical metal funds, and fee is most of the tracking gap here.
Stated mandate
PALL The Trust's objective is for its Shares to reflect the price performance of physical palladium, after deducting Trust expenses.
SIVR The Trust seeks to track the price of physical silver, after deducting its expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PALL vs SIVR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PALL vs SIVR Cost
Overpaying PALL vs SIVR
$5,668
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PALL 0.60%
$11,817
SIVR 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PALL | SIVR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $545 | $531 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $2,113 | $2,003 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $6,149 | $5,668 |
- 0.60%PALL
- 0.30%SIVR, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
SIVR cheapest of 9 funds
PALL 5th cheapest of 9 funds
PALL vs SIVR Dividends
- PALL None
- SIVR None
Distribution history
PALL vs SIVR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PALL
- SIVR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PALL 32.4%, betterSIVR 37.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PALL −0.13SIVR 0.75, better
- Worst fall
- PALL −73.6%SIVR −57.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PALL 0.46SIVR 1.26
PALL and SIVR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


