Skip to content

PALL vs SIVR

abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF

PALLCNYSE Arca

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

SIVRANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SIVR −0.30pt a year

PALL0.60%SIVR0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

SIVR 1.7×the volume

PALL859KSIVR1.47M

10Y return · a year

SIVR +6.3pt

PALL+4.1%SIVR+10.4%

PALL vs SIVR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−52.1%PALL+103.7%SIVR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PALL −52.1%. SIVR +103.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%200%300%400%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PALL 0.60%
SIVR 0.30%, better
Fund size
PALL $505M
SIVR $3.45B
1Y total return
PALL −32.5%
SIVR +1.5%, better
Holdings
PALL 1
SIVR 1
Avg volume (30D)
PALL 859K sh
SIVR 1.47M sh, better
NAV per share
PALL $17.62
SIVR $47.57
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PALL: Cost 41, Risk 26, Mission 78, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 59. SIVR: Cost 92, Risk 37, Mission 89, Tradability 52, Holdings not scored, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for PALL, SIVR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPALLSIVR
Cost30% weightC41A92Higher
Mission25% weightA78A89Higher
Risk15% weightD26D37Higher
Tradability15% weightB59HigherC52
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB59A73Higher

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PALL and SIVR are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

SIVR ranks 1st and PALL 6th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 5BPPLTabrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETFScore 59
  4. Rank 6CPALLabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 7CYSAGTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PALLCabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF

SIVRAabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

In short

PALL Palladium bars, not palladium futures. Running since 2010, this abrdn trust aims to reflect the price of physical palladium after expenses: one metal, one price, no roll schedule to babysit.

SIVR Silver bullion in a vault, wrapped in a ticker. SIVR has done that one job since 2009 at 0.30% a year, half the going rate for physical metal funds, and fee is most of the tracking gap here.

Stated mandate

PALL The Trust's objective is for its Shares to reflect the price performance of physical palladium, after deducting Trust expenses.

SIVR The Trust seeks to track the price of physical silver, after deducting its expenses.

Why people hold it

  • PALL One job, stated plainly: shares reflect the price of physical palladium after trust expenses. No futures ladder, no index committee, no tracking basket to decode.
  • Trading since 2010 and an actively traded name in its physical-commodity group, so getting a position on or off is usually straightforward.
  • Part of abrdn's physical metals shelf alongside silver (SIVR), platinum (PPLT) and the GLTR precious-metals basket, so shifting metals keeps you in one familiar structure.
  • SIVR 0.30% a year, versus a 0.60% median across physical metal funds and 0.50% at the biggest silver trust, SLV. When the mandate is just holding metal, cost is the differentiator.
  • The mandate is one sentence: track the price of physical silver after expenses. Real metal, not futures contracts, swaps, or miner stocks standing in for the metal.
  • A multi-billion-dollar trust that trades actively, so entering and exiting is usually a routine order rather than a hunt for the other side.
  • Running since 2009 and rated among the strongest implementations in the physical commodity group, on both cost and how closely it delivers its stated mandate.

Worth knowing

  • PALL The 0.60% expense ratio is the median for physically backed metal trusts, not a bargain. SIVR charges 0.30%, SLV and PLTM 0.50%, though those hold different metals.
  • Nothing gets paid out. The whole result is the metal's price minus the trust's expenses, so there's no income to soften a flat stretch.
  • One metal, one mood. This sits among the more volatile members of its physical-metals group, with no basket alongside it to smooth a rough palladium run.
  • SIVR One metal, one price. Silver moves hard in both directions and there is no diversification inside the trust to soften it.
  • Bullion generates no cash flow, so this is a price-only holding rather than an income one.
  • It is a commodity trust, not a registered 1940 Act fund, so the legal protections and tax treatment differ from a standard stock or bond ETF.

Full PALL profile⁠

Full SIVR profile⁠

PALL vs SIVR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PALL vs SIVR Cost

Overpaying PALL vs SIVR

$5,668

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PALL 0.60%

    $11,817

  • SIVR 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PALL 0.60%
  • SIVR 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PALL $11,817SIVR $6,149

Year by year

YearPALLSIVROverpaying
10$1,076$545$531
20$4,116$2,113$2,003
30$11,817$6,149$5,668

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%PALL
  • 0.30%SIVR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

SIVR cheapest of 9 funds

PALL 5th cheapest of 9 funds

PALL vs SIVR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PALL None
SIVR None

Distribution history

PALLAll PALL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIVRAll SIVR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PALL vs SIVR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PALL
  • SIVR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PALL −73.6% · Aug 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PALL 32.4%, betterSIVR 37.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PALL −0.13SIVR 0.75, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PALL −73.6%SIVR −57.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PALL 0.46SIVR 1.26

PALL and SIVR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PALLCvsSLVB

    abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIVRAvsSLVB

    abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PALLCvsPLTMB

    abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIVRAvsPLTMB

    abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PALLCvsGLTRB

    abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIVRAvsGLTRB

    abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.