Skip to content

PALL vs SLV

abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF

PALLCNYSE Arca

iShares Silver Trust

SLVBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SLV −0.10pt a year

PALL0.60%SLV0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

SLV 19.0×the volume

PALL859KSLV16.3M

10Y return · a year

SLV +6.0pt

PALL+4.1%SLV+10.1%

PALL vs SLV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−52.1%PALL+101.9%SLV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PALL −52.1%. SLV +101.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%200%300%400%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PALL 0.60%
SLV 0.50%, better
Fund size
PALL $505M
SLV $25.2B
1Y total return
PALL −32.5%
SLV +1.3%, better
Holdings
PALL 1
SLV 1
Avg volume (30D)
PALL 859K sh
SLV 16.3M sh, better
NAV per share
PALL $17.62
SLV $45.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PALL: Cost 41, Risk 26, Mission 78, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 59. SLV: Cost 67, Risk 37, Mission 89, Tradability 71, Holdings not scored, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for PALL, SLV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPALLSLV
Cost30% weightC41B67Higher
Mission25% weightA78A89Higher
Risk15% weightD26D37Higher
Tradability15% weightB59A71Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB59A84Higher

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PALL and SLV are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

SLV ranks 2nd and PALL 6th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 3BPLTMGraniteShares Platinum TrustScore 65
  4. Rank 5BPPLTabrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 6CPALLabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETFScore 52
  6. Rank 7CYSAGTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PALLCabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF

SLVBiShares Silver Trust

In short

PALL Palladium bars, not palladium futures. Running since 2010, this abrdn trust aims to reflect the price of physical palladium after expenses: one metal, one price, no roll schedule to babysit.

SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.

Stated mandate

PALL The Trust's objective is for its Shares to reflect the price performance of physical palladium, after deducting Trust expenses.

SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.

Why people hold it

  • PALL One job, stated plainly: shares reflect the price of physical palladium after trust expenses. No futures ladder, no index committee, no tracking basket to decode.
  • Trading since 2010 and an actively traded name in its physical-commodity group, so getting a position on or off is usually straightforward.
  • Part of abrdn's physical metals shelf alongside silver (SIVR), platinum (PPLT) and the GLTR precious-metals basket, so shifting metals keeps you in one familiar structure.
  • SLV The deep end of the silver pool: running since 2006, a multi-billion-dollar trust, and very actively traded, which is what keeps spreads tight and the options market busy.
  • Metal, not machinery. Assets are physical silver held by a custodian and priced off the LBMA Silver Price. No futures roll, no miner earnings, no swap counterparty.sec.gov
  • 0.50% a year, under the typical physical-metal trust, and the design is about as plain as it gets: bullion price minus expenses, tracked closely.

Worth knowing

  • PALL The 0.60% expense ratio is the median for physically backed metal trusts, not a bargain. SIVR charges 0.30%, SLV and PLTM 0.50%, though those hold different metals.
  • Nothing gets paid out. The whole result is the metal's price minus the trust's expenses, so there's no income to soften a flat stretch.
  • One metal, one mood. This sits among the more volatile members of its physical-metals group, with no basket alongside it to smooth a rough palladium run.
  • SLV SIVR runs the same physical-silver idea for 0.30%. The extra fee here buys size and trading depth, not different metal.
  • No income. Bullion pays nothing, and the trustee sells silver to cover expenses, so the metal behind each share slowly shrinks.sec.gov
  • One metal, one price. Nothing inside the trust cushions a silver drawdown, and silver is a jumpy market by nature.

Full PALL profile⁠

Full SLV profile⁠

PALL vs SLV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PALL vs SLV Cost

Overpaying PALL vs SLV

$1,838

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PALL 0.60%

    $11,817

  • SLV 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PALL 0.60%
  • SLV 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PALL $11,817SLV $9,979

Year by year

YearPALLSLVOverpaying
10$1,076$900$176
20$4,116$3,460$656
30$11,817$9,979$1,838

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%PALL
  • 0.50%SLV, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

PALL 5th cheapest of 9 funds

PALL vs SLV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PALL None
SLV None

Distribution history

PALLAll PALL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SLVAll SLV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PALL vs SLV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PALL
  • SLV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PALL −73.6% · Aug 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PALL 32.4%, betterSLV 37.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PALL −0.13SLV 0.75, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PALL −73.6%SLV −57.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PALL 0.46SLV 1.26

PALL and SLV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PALLCvsSIVRA

    abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsSIVRA

    iShares Silver Trust · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PALLCvsPLTMB

    abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsPLTMB

    iShares Silver Trust · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PALLCvsGLTRB

    abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsGLTRB

    iShares Silver Trust · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.