SLV ranks 2nd and PALL 6th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
PALL vs SLV
SLV −0.10pt a year
0.60%0.50%
SLV 19.0×the volume
859K16.3M
SLV +6.0pt
+4.1%+10.1%
PALL vs SLV Performance
−52.1%+101.9%
- PALL 0.60%
- SLV 0.50%, better
- PALL $505M
- SLV $25.2B
- PALL −32.5%
- SLV +1.3%, better
- PALL 1
- SLV 1
- PALL 859K sh
- SLV 16.3M sh, better
- PALL $17.62
- SLV $45.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PALL | SLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | B67Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A89Higher |
| Risk | D26 | D37Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | A84Higher |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. PALL and SLV are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PALLC
SLVB
In short
PALL Palladium bars, not palladium futures. Running since 2010, this abrdn trust aims to reflect the price of physical palladium after expenses: one metal, one price, no roll schedule to babysit.
SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.
Stated mandate
PALL The Trust's objective is for its Shares to reflect the price performance of physical palladium, after deducting Trust expenses.
SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PALL vs SLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PALL vs SLV Cost
Overpaying PALL vs SLV
$1,838
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PALL 0.60%
$11,817
SLV 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PALL | SLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $900 | $176 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $3,460 | $656 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $9,979 | $1,838 |
- 0.60%PALL
- 0.50%SLV, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
PALL 5th cheapest of 9 funds
PALL vs SLV Dividends
- PALL None
- SLV None
Distribution history
PALL vs SLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PALL
- SLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PALL 32.4%, betterSLV 37.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PALL −0.13SLV 0.75, better
- Worst fall
- PALL −73.6%SLV −57.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PALL 0.46SLV 1.26
PALL and SLV in the news
Price vs Value
iShares silver fund's 1.38% discount was a morning price

First-Year Review
Kurv's silver fund paid $7.70 in year one and still lagged the metal



Price vs Value
URNJ closed 1.57% below the value of its miners Friday


Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.