NTSI vs RSST

NTSIBWisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

RSSTCReturn Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF

In short

NTSI Developed-market stocks and a U.S. Treasury futures sleeve sharing one seat. NTSI is WisdomTree's capital-efficient playbook pointed overseas: the stock exposure and the bond exposure don't have to compete for the same dollar.

RSST Return stacking, literally: RSST rides an actively managed futures program on top of a full U.S. equity portfolio, using leverage so one dollar does two jobs.

Stated mandate

NTSI The Fund seeks total return through international equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures. WisdomTree presents it as a capital-efficient balanced strategy intended to provide international equity exposure with Treasury-futures diversification.

RSST The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed and combines U.S. equity and managed-futures strategies, using leverage to stack approximately one dollar of exposure to each strategy.

Why people hold it

• NTSI Charges 0.26% a year, roughly a third of what the typical allocation fund in its group costs.
• One wrapper, two jobs: developed international equities plus U.S. Treasury futures, so the bond side doesn't eat cash the stock side needs.
• The equity base is broad, roughly 500 names across developed markets outside the U.S.
• One of the stronger builds in a crowded allocation field, alongside WisdomTree siblings NTSX (U.S. version) and GDE (gold version).

• RSST One dollar, two jobs: the U.S. equity sleeve stays fully invested while the managed futures strategy is stacked on top with leverage, not funded by selling stocks.
• Actively managed on both sides, so the futures sleeve can shift its positioning instead of tracking a fixed index.
• Easy to deal in for something this complicated: it sits among the smoother-trading names in its multi-asset peer group.

Worth knowing

• NTSI Futures push total exposure above the cash invested. That cuts both ways: moves are amplified up and down.
• Thinly traded, so spreads can add to the cost of getting in and out beyond the headline fee.
• Actively run on quantitative models and launched in 2021, a shorter history than the plain-vanilla balanced funds it sits next to.

• RSST At 0.99% a year it runs above the typical multi-asset allocation fund. Simpler stackers like NTSX and GDE charge 0.20%.
• Leverage cuts both ways: a rough stretch for stocks and managed futures at the same time lands harder than either sleeve would alone.
• Launched in 2023 and structured as a commodity pool, so the record is short and the wrapper differs from a plain-vanilla stock ETF.

Full NTSI profile⁠

Full RSST profile⁠