GDE ranks 3rd and RSST 12th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
GDE vs RSST
GDE −0.79pt a year
0.20%0.99%
RSST 1.03×the volume
125K129K
GDE +19.2pt
+41.1%+21.9%
GDE vs RSST Performance
+2.6%+22.7%
- GDE 0.20%, better
- RSST 0.99%
- GDE $375M
- RSST $585M
- GDE +2.6%
- RSST +22.7%, better
- GDE 17.06%, better
- RSST 0.94%
- GDE 498
- RSST 15
- GDE 125K sh
- RSST 129K sh, better
- GDE $51.01
- RSST $34.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDE | RSST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | D28 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | D27 | D35Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | |
| Durability | A78Higher | A71 |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. GDE and RSST are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDEB
RSSTC
In short
GDE Gold and US large caps, stacked on the same dollar. GDE holds roughly 500 US large-cap stocks and layers gold futures on top, so the metal rides along instead of crowding equities out of the portfolio.
RSST Return stacking, literally: RSST rides an actively managed futures program on top of a full U.S. equity portfolio, using leverage so one dollar does two jobs.
Stated mandate
GDE The fund seeks total return by investing directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary in U.S.-listed gold futures contracts and U.S. large-cap equity securities.
RSST The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed and combines U.S. equity and managed-futures strategies, using leverage to stack approximately one dollar of exposure to each strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDE vs RSST Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDE vs RSST Cost
Overpaying RSST vs GDE
$14,370
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDE 0.20%
$4,155
RSST 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDE | RSST | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,746 | $1,381 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $6,565 | $5,144 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $18,525 | $14,370 |
- 0.20%GDE, cheaper
- 0.99%RSST
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
GDE 2nd cheapest of 19 funds
RSST 14th cheapest of 19 funds
GDE vs RSST Dividends
- GDE 17.06%, better
- RSST 0.94%
- GDE $8.73
- RSST $0.32
- GDE $8.58
- RSST $0.32
- GDE Oct 27, 2026
- RSST Dec 29, 2025
- GDE Oct 29, 2026
- RSST Dec 30, 2025
- GDE Annual
- RSST Annual
Distribution history
GDE vs RSST Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDE 20.7%RSST 17.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GDE 1.58, betterRSST 0.97
- Worst fall
- GDE −32.0%RSST −30.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GDE 1.00RSST 1.14
GDE and RSST in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




