Skip to content

TNUK vs URA

Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF

TNUKCNYSE Arca

Global X Uranium ETF

URABNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

URA −0.06pt a year

TNUK0.75%URA0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

URA 4472.1×the volume

TNUK763URA3.41M

TNUK vs URA Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−16.2%TNUK−22.9%URA

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. TNUK −16.2%. URA −22.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%30%40%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
TNUK 0.75%
URA 0.69%, better
Fund size
TNUK $1M
URA $4.73B
1Y total return
TNUK No data
URA −37.3%
Yield (12M)
TNUK No data
URA 6.33%
Holdings
TNUK 26
URA 60
Avg volume (30D)
TNUK 763 sh
URA 3.41M sh, better
NAV per share
TNUK $20.98
URA $33.94
52W range

ETF.net Grade

TNUK: Cost 42, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 55, Durability 33. URA: Cost 62, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 50, Durability 89.
Pillar letters and Scores for TNUK, URA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTNUKURA
Cost30% weightC42B62Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB55HigherD39
Tradability15% weightD27B67Higher
Holdings10% weightB55HigherC50
Durability5% weightD33A89Higher

Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. TNUK and URA are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Uranium & Nuclear⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

URA ranks 4th and TNUK 7th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.

  1. Rank 1ANLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2BSMRFALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BRCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4BURAGlobal X Uranium ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 5CNUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 6CURNMSprott Uranium Miners ETFScore 41
  7. Rank 7CTNUKTortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETFScore 40
  8. Rank 8DURNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

TNUKCTortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF

URABGlobal X Uranium ETF

In short

TNUK Most nuclear funds stop at the uranium miners. TNUK buys the whole chain: the diggers, the reactor designers and builders, and the crews that operate them, anywhere in the world. A December 2025 arrival priced right at the category midpoint.

URA The original US uranium ETF, trading since 2010, long before the nuclear theme got crowded. It holds roughly 50 names spanning miners and nuclear-component makers, so the reactor supply chain rides along with the yellowcake.

Stated mandate

TNUK The Fund seeks total return by investing in companies across the nuclear energy value chain, including uranium mining and milling, reactor design and construction, and nuclear reactor operation and maintenance.

URA The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. It concentrates at least 80% of assets in companies involved in uranium or nuclear-component activities.

Why people hold it

  • TNUK Covers the full nuclear value chain: uranium mining and milling, reactor design and construction, and reactor operation and maintenance, not just the fuel end.
  • The 0.75% expense ratio sits exactly at the median for uranium and nuclear funds, and under Range's NUKZ at 0.85%.
  • Global by mandate, which matters when much of the reactor-building and utility side of the industry sits outside the US.
  • Plain equity fund in a standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper. No leverage, no swaps, no outcome period to track.
  • URA Launched in 2010, the first US fund on this theme, and today a multi-billion-dollar, actively traded name. Size and volume usually mean tighter spreads for the person clicking buy.
  • 0.69% expense ratio sits below the typical fee among uranium and nuclear funds, which is rare for a single-theme product this specialized.
  • Not a pure miner basket. The index reaches into nuclear components too, with at least 80% of assets in uranium or nuclear-component companies, worldwide.
  • Rates as one of the stronger builds in its uranium and nuclear peer group on cost, tradability and staying power.

Worth knowing

  • TNUK Launched in December 2025, so there is no long track record, and it is a small fund next to category veterans like URA and NLR.
  • Trades lightly compared with the category's heavyweights, so spreads can be wide and limit orders do real work here.
  • The mandate is total return, and the fund has not been making distributions. Income is not the job.
  • URA One theme, about 50 stocks. Uranium prices, mine permits and reactor policy move the whole basket at once, and the ride has historically been bumpy.
  • A cheaper shelf-mate exists: NLR charges 0.52% for a nearby uranium and nuclear mandate.
  • Global mandate means overseas miners, so foreign currency and permitting regimes come with the package. Distributions arrive once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full TNUK profile⁠

Full URA profile⁠

TNUK vs URA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TNUK vs URA Cost

Overpaying TNUK vs URA

$1,053

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • TNUK 0.75%

    $14,482

  • URA 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • TNUK 0.75%
  • URA 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530TNUK $14,482URA $13,429

Year by year

YearTNUKURAOverpaying
10$1,336$1,232$104
20$5,078$4,697$381
30$14,482$13,429$1,053

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%TNUK
  • 0.69%URA, cheaper
  • Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
  • Median 0.75%

URA 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

TNUK 5th cheapest of 9 funds

TNUK vs URA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
TNUK No data
URA 6.33%
Payout (12M)
TNUK None
URA $2.08
Last payment
TNUK No data
URA $2.08
Ex-dividend
TNUK No data
URA Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
TNUK No data
URA Jan 7, 2026
Frequency
TNUK No data
URA Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

TNUKAll TNUK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

URAAnnual · 14 paymentsAll URA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.31; Dec 28, 2018 $0.05; Jun 27, 2019 $0.10; Dec 30, 2019 $0.08; Jun 29, 2020 $0.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.10; Jun 29, 2021 $0.02; Dec 30, 2021 $1.31; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.05; Dec 28, 2023 $1.68; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Dec 30, 2024 $0.74; Dec 30, 2025 $2.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

TNUK vs URA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
TNUK No dataURA 43.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
TNUK No dataURA 0.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
TNUK No dataURA −46.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
TNUK 1.06URA 1.41

TNUK and URA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • TNUKCvsNLRA

    Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • URABvsNLRA

    Global X Uranium ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TNUKCvsSMRFB

    Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • URABvsSMRFB

    Global X Uranium ETF · ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TNUKCvsRCTRB

    Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • URABvsRCTRB

    Global X Uranium ETF · First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.