Skip to content

CTAP vs NTSE

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund

NTSECNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAP −0.21pt a year

CTAP0.13%NTSE0.34%

Avg volume · 30D

CTAP 27.5×the volume

CTAP86.8KNTSE3.16K

CTAP vs NTSE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+12.8%CTAP+16.5%NTSE

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CTAP +12.8%. NTSE +16.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%30%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CTAP 0.13%, better
NTSE 0.34%
Fund size
CTAP $167M
NTSE $52M
1Y total return
CTAP No data
NTSE +16.5%
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
NTSE 2.16%
Holdings
CTAP 42
NTSE 426
Avg volume (30D)
CTAP 86.8K sh, better
NTSE 3.16K sh
NAV per share
CTAP $30.26
NTSE $43.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59. NTSE: Cost 72, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 5, Holdings 53, Durability 51.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAP, NTSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAPNTSE
Cost30% weightA100HigherA72
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45HigherD36
Tradability15% weightB67HigherF5
Holdings10% weightC42C53Higher
Durability5% weightB59HigherC51

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAP and NTSE are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

CTAP ranks 2nd and NTSE 9th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69
  4. Rank 8CRPARRPAR Risk Parity ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 9CNTSEWisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core FundScore 47
  6. Rank 10CGDTWisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold FundScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

NTSECWisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund

In short

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

NTSE Emerging-markets stocks with a Treasury chaser. NTSE holds 90% EM equities and layers a 60% laddered US Treasury futures overlay on top, so a dollar of fund buys about $1.50 of market exposure. WisdomTree's Efficient Core playbook, pointed at EM.

Stated mandate

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

NTSE The Fund seeks total return through emerging-markets equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures. It is actively managed with a models-based process.

Why people hold it

  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.
  • NTSE The 90/60 build is the whole idea: about 90% of assets in EM stocks, the rest as collateral for laddered Treasury futures (2 to 30 year maturities, 3 to 8 year target duration). Bonds without selling stocks.sec.govsaytechnologies.com
  • Charges 0.32% a year, under the typical fund in its emerging-markets peer group, despite being actively managed with a models-based process rather than a plain index tracker.sec.gov
  • Broad underneath the overlay: roughly 400 EM stocks spanning every major sector, with rebalancing back toward the 90/60 target when either sleeve drifts by 5% or more. Pays quarterly.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us
  • NTSE Leverage works both directions. Roughly 150% total exposure means selloffs land harder than in plain EM beta, and you carry US interest-rate risk alongside emerging-markets equity risk.sec.gov
  • Straight EM index exposure costs less: VEXC at 0.07% and BKEM at 0.11% skip the futures overlay entirely. You are paying up for the structure, not the stocks.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's household names, and one of the smaller funds in its group, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the headline expense ratio suggests.

Full CTAP profile⁠

Full NTSE profile⁠

CTAP vs NTSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAP vs NTSE Cost

Overpaying NTSE vs CTAP

$4,206

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

  • NTSE 0.34%

    $6,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAP 0.13%
  • NTSE 0.34%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530NTSE $6,932CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearCTAPNTSEOverpaying
10$238$616$378
20$930$2,386$1,456
30$2,726$6,932$4,206

Expense ratio

  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • 0.34%NTSE
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

NTSE 6th cheapest of 19 funds

CTAP vs NTSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
NTSE 2.16%
Payout (12M)
CTAP No data
NTSE $0.94
Last payment
CTAP $0.30
NTSE $0.25
Ex-dividend
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
NTSE Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
NTSE Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
CTAP Quarterly
NTSE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
NTSEQuarterly · 23 paymentsAll NTSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2021 $0.06; Sep 24, 2021 $0.30; Dec 7, 2021 $0.26; Dec 27, 2021 $0.16; Mar 25, 2022 $0.12; Jun 24, 2022 $0.16; Sep 26, 2022 $0.43; Dec 23, 2022 $0.15; Mar 27, 2023 $0.07; Jun 26, 2023 $0.19; Sep 25, 2023 $0.37; Dec 22, 2023 $0.07; Mar 22, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.10; Sep 25, 2024 $0.44; Dec 26, 2024 $0.32; Mar 26, 2025 $0.11; Jun 25, 2025 $0.23; Sep 25, 2025 $0.54; Dec 26, 2025 $0.39; Mar 26, 2026 $0.09; Jun 25, 2026 $0.21; Sep 25, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

CTAP vs NTSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAP No dataNTSE 17.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAP No dataNTSE 1.04
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAP No dataNTSE −38.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAP 1.34NTSE 1.20

CTAP and NTSE in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CTAPAvsNTSXA

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSECvsNTSXA

    WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsGDEB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSECvsGDEB

    WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSECvsNTSIB

    WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.