GDE ranks 3rd and NTSE 9th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
GDE vs NTSE
GDE −0.14pt a year
0.20%0.34%
GDE 39.7×the volume
125K3.16K
GDE +17.5pt
+40.1%+22.6%
GDE vs NTSE Performance
+3.1%+16.5%
- GDE 0.20%, better
- NTSE 0.34%
- GDE $375M
- NTSE $52M
- GDE +3.1%
- NTSE +16.5%, better
- GDE 16.98%, better
- NTSE 2.16%
- GDE 498
- NTSE 426
- GDE 125K sh, better
- NTSE 3.16K sh
- GDE $51.01
- NTSE $43.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDE | NTSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A72 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | D25 | D36Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | F5 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A78Higher | C51 |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. GDE and NTSE are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDEB
NTSEC
In short
GDE Gold and US large caps, stacked on the same dollar. GDE holds roughly 500 US large-cap stocks and layers gold futures on top, so the metal rides along instead of crowding equities out of the portfolio.
NTSE Emerging-markets stocks with a Treasury chaser. NTSE holds 90% EM equities and layers a 60% laddered US Treasury futures overlay on top, so a dollar of fund buys about $1.50 of market exposure. WisdomTree's Efficient Core playbook, pointed at EM.
Stated mandate
GDE The fund seeks total return by investing directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary in U.S.-listed gold futures contracts and U.S. large-cap equity securities.
NTSE The Fund seeks total return through emerging-markets equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures. It is actively managed with a models-based process.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDE vs NTSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDE vs NTSE Cost
Overpaying NTSE vs GDE
$2,777
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDE 0.20%
$4,155
NTSE 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDE | NTSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $616 | $251 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $2,386 | $965 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $6,932 | $2,777 |
- 0.20%GDE, cheaper
- 0.34%NTSE
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
GDE 2nd cheapest of 19 funds
NTSE 6th cheapest of 19 funds
GDE vs NTSE Dividends
- GDE 16.98%, better
- NTSE 2.16%
- GDE $8.73
- NTSE $0.94
- GDE $8.58
- NTSE $0.25
- GDE Oct 27, 2026
- NTSE Sep 25, 2026
- GDE Oct 29, 2026
- NTSE Sep 29, 2026
- GDE Annual
- NTSE Quarterly
Distribution history
GDE vs NTSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDE 20.7%NTSE 17.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GDE 1.58, betterNTSE 1.04
- Worst fall
- GDE −32.0%NTSE −38.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GDE 1.00NTSE 1.20
GDE and NTSE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
